Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T22CM02773
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/18/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM02773 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Sheet CS: It appears that the IEBC is being used lieu of the IBC. One is free to use either code but not both, unless specifically referenced by the IEBC. If the IEBC is the desired approach, one must choose 1 of 4 compliance paths. These compliance paths cannot be used in combination with each other in accordance Section 301.3 of the IEBC. It is important to note that the Chapter 3 requirements apply to all compliance methods. 1. Prescriptive compliance method: Chapter 5: The prescriptive approach is the simplest method to follow in terms of code requirements, but is also the most conservative approach. 2. Work area compliance method: Chapters 6-12:The work area compliance method provides the greatest amount of benefits to the building owner and design professional. This is the easiest route to take. It is much more conservative. 3. Performance compliance method: Chapter 13: This method focuses on what the building is required to do, rather than prescribing how it is to be constructed. This method requires the design profession to work more closely with the owner of the building, as well as the code official, to ensure that design meets specific requirements for the occupants and not simply the prescriptive requirements. 4. Previously adopted code: Section 301.3 Exception 1. This method utilizes a previously adopted code under which the area in question was most recently built or modified; this requires the code official’s approval. Please clearly indicate which compliance method has been chosen and provide a narrative outlining the applicable code requirements. 1. Provide a thorough egress plan that includes the furniture plan and show all exiting paths and travel distance measurements. 2. Indicate the location of egress illumination on the RCP in accordance with Section 1008. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/26/2022 | SSHIELD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/26/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/26/2022 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 04/29/2022 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See building comments. john.vincent@tucsonaz.gov 5203495581 |
| 05/09/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed directly after the water meter for buildings that have food service facilities and are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2022 | VVERA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |