Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T22CM02442
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/05/2022 | PCAMARE1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/05/2022 | PAUL CAMARENA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T22CM02442 DEMO/ New SFR 221 E LEE ST Zoning R-2 TRANSMITTAL DATE:?April 5 ,2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. The Pima County Assessor’s effective construction date for your building or structure is 1953. The actual construction date may be earlier. Buildings, portions of buildings or structures that are 50 years of age or older must be architecturally documented prior to demolition. Documentation will be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Office before a permit is issued. Demolition (Historic and Older Structures) Application and General Information may be downloaded (PDF) at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-application-forms-submittal-requirements Return completed documentation to PDSDHistoric@tucsonaz.gov. Applicant will be contacted within 5 working days if additional materials are required for review. 1.COMMENT: Provide a Residential Plot Plan that meets the requirements found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Residential_Plot_Plan_Requirements.pdf. This shall in include: a. Lot coverage calculation that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.3 & the example shown on the residential plot requirements. b. Zoning of adjacent parcels c. All Utility lines d. Property line distances e. Actual setback dimension on all side . 2.COMMENT: Provide a proposed site plan showing all the proposed work for this project. Remove the notation for "Preliminary only not for construction.. 3.COMMENT: Provide permit documentation for the shed and ramada on the south portion of the property. If no permits are available provide the setback, height, and square footage of the shed and ramada. Remove the notation of the trailer for the site plan as it is not considered a structure. Please clarify if anyone is living in the trailer. 4.COMMENT: Revise the elevation drawing to provide a scale, and revise the labels to cardinal directions. Dimension and label the height of the new structure measured from design grade to top of wall. 5.COMMENT: The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). Based on a wall height of 20’-6” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed SFR to the west property line is 13’-9”, proposed setback is 3’-0”. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback, DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov 6.COMMENT: The front yard setback in an established area per UDC section 6.4.5.C.1.a "is 20ft or one and one-half the height of the proposed wall (H), Measured from the street property line" . 7.COMMENT: Clarify the use of this project 8.COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/21/2022 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide a complete plan set for review. |
| 05/19/2022 | PCAMARE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed |