Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T22CM02235
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/22/2022 | ARUIZ1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | PLEASE CONTACT PC ADDRESSING BUILDING NUMBER NEEDS TO BE ASSIGNED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE Ph# 520-724-9512, EMAIL:ADDRESSING@PIMA.GOV |
| 06/28/2022 | PAUL CAMARENA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T22CM02227, T22CM02228, T22CM02229, T22CM02230, T22CM02231, T22CM02232, T22CM02233, T22CM02234, T22CM02235, T22CM02236 T22CM02237,T22CM02238, T22CM02239 Multi-Family (2nd Review) 1701 E VALENCIA RD Zoning C-2 TRANSMITTAL: June 28, 2022 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the associated unapproved Development Package DP22-0029. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/28/2022 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 06/28/2022 | SSHIELD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The DP needs to be approved before the building plans can be approved. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/05/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM02227 - T22CM02239 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Refer to Structural Calculations and Foundation Plan S1.1 (18-Plex). The Footings size marked as F-4 (2’-4” Sq) along perimeter does not match with Structural Calculations submitted (3’-4” Sq). Revise drawing to match Structural Calculations. 2. Refer to Structural Drawing S2.1(18-Plex). The Drawing shows shear wall SW6 at second floor on the outer edge and the Structural Calculations show SW7 at second floor. Revise Drawing. Submit a response letter addressing these correction items and provide bubbles on the revisions to the drawings. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Sheet T1.0: PREVIOUS COMMENT: The applicable list only contains one building codes. Provide the comprehensive list of applicable and adopted building codes for this project. The editions of building codes provided have not been provided. Provide the applicable and adopted editions. 1. Sheet A1.0: The allowable area increase calculations are incorrectly calculated. Provided corrected calculations in accordance for single occupancy multi story buildings (506.2.3 & Equation 5-2). Clearly show the formulas with the corrected information calculated. 2. Sheet A1.0: The frontage increase formula provided is incorrect. While the answer is correct, the formula is incorrect. Provide a correct frontage increase formula in accordance with Section 506.3.2 and Equation 5-5. 3. Sheet A1.0: The allowable tabular floor area provided is incorrect. Provide a corrected allowable tabular area in accordance with Table 506.2. 4. Sheet A10.0: Detail #12 doesn't exist as stated in the comment letter. Provide the requested detail. 5. Sheet A2.12: The finish schedule provided does not provide the interior finish classes of the materials being used. Provide the interior finish classes. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved 1. Kitchen exhaust to all apartment units shall exhaust to the outdoors sheet M4.6 (IMC2018,505.1) Complied 2. Approved/Subject to field approval ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Second Plumbing Review: 1).SAME- add gutter and Downspout illustrations with sizes & calculations to plan pages A6.0, 6.1, 6.2 or A3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4. -IPC 1106.3 & 1106.6 ** Still missing sizing calculations** 2). Now that pool combustion air opening has been added to plan page M1.0 that opening needs to be within 12" of ceiling. IFGC 304.6.2 3). OK 4). SAME- Detail #4 on plan page P4.3 states the water heater relief valve is to be piped to the exterior, how will the piping reach that destination and still maintain the relief valve's manufacturer required 4 fitting allowable maximum the 30ft maximum distance be maintained? (Suggest pipe to water heater pan) -IPC 303.2 , 504.6 #5 5). OK-The total DFU load for all buildings is 3336 DFUs, the 8" sewer main on Utility plan pages 1.0 & 2.0 is undersized the sewer needs to be 10 or 12" depending on pitch. -IPC 710.1 **OK PER UTILITY SIZING METHOD PER ENGINEER RESPONSE** 6). SAME- Add Fixture spacing measurements to plan pages A2.7 & A2.8 -IPC 404.2 & 405.3.1 7), SAME- Add Shower base or shower pan material specs to plan page P5.0 -IPC 106.3.1 , 421.5 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/05/2022 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |