Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T22CM01768
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/22/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM01768 5022 S Cassia Way - R-2 Convert Garage to Room and Enclose Existing Porch to Rooms (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: February 22, 2022 COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1). This site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). A single-family residence (SFR) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 - 9. 1. The “EXISTING SHED” shown on the plans appears sometime after 2018 and Zoning was not able to find an approved compliance review for this structure. Either provided the approved documents for this structure or include in in this permit. It does not appear that the shed meets the required perimeter yard setbacks of 6’-0” or 2/3 the height of the exterior wall, as measured from design grade, greater of the two. Per UDC Article 6.6.2.D An accessory structure that exceeds the allowable height of a wall within a perimeter yard and is detached from a principal structure shall comply with the perimeter yard width standards of the principal structure, except that the accessory structure may be built to a parcel line with the consent of the adjoining or, when separated by an alley, adjacent property owner(s). To secure this neighbor setback waiver the following statement must be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the adjacent property owner(s): My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ Provide the required signoffs on this plot plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 03/22/2022 | SSHIELD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/22/2022 | SSHIELD1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/08/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM01768 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. 2018 IRC (Prescriptive) Table N1102.1.2 (R402.1.2). Revise rafter size for ceiling insulation of R-38 (12 inches of space required) or provide unvented enclosed rafter framing with air-permeable insulation (R806.5.2 climate zone 2B). MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |