Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T22CM01504
Parcel: 113100580

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO

Permit Number - T22CM01504
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/08/2022 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Passed
03/23/2022 PAUL CAMARENA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: Paul Camarena
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: T22CM01504
Building Plan Review (1st Review)
1726 E MITCHELL ST Zoning R-2

TRANSMITTAL DATE: ?March ?15, ?2022


COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.


1.COMMENT: Please clarify if this accessory structure is going to be a sleep quarters. If so a regular fridge is not allowed for a sleeping quarters you are allowed to have a under the counter fridge. On the electrical panel schedule there is a call out for a refrigerator please clarify.

2.COMMENTS: The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet, or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). Based on a wall height of 10’-2” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed accessory structure to the south property line is 6’-10”, the proposed setback is 6’-0”. Based on a wall height of 12’-8” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed accessory structure to the west property line is 8’-6”, the proposed setback is 6’-0”. At a minimum, a neighbor’s setback waiver is required to reduce the perimeter yard setback. To secure this waiver the following text shall be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the owner of the property to the south and to the west:
My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan.

Signature: _____________________________

Date: _________________________________

If you are unable to secure the neighbor’s setback waiver a Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be processed and approved to reduce the setback. DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov
03/23/2022 IMONSHI1 NPPO REVIEW Passed
03/31/2022 SAFEBUILT 2ND PARTY REVIEW REVIEW Reqs Change Activity Number: T22CM01504


GENERAL:
Provide written responses to all review comments.
Provide a complete plan set.
Provide additional documents as requested by review staff.


STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
Approved


BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS:
Approved


MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
Denied
1. 2018 IRC Section M1201.1 and M1301.1. Provide mechanical drawings for review before installation.


ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS
Approved


PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS:
Approved


If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov