Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T22CM01239
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/08/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/15/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM01239 2109 E 2nd St – R-2 Addition and remodel duplex and add garage (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: March 15, 2022 Provided a detail comment response letter with your submittal that clearly shows how you have addressed all comments with your next submittal. This site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). A duplex is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10. 1. The lot coverage calculation is not correct and should include the vehicle use area located between the proposed garage and the alley that provided access, see UDC Article 6.4.3.B.3.b. 2. As the proposed addition/remodel to the existing duplex and the final product will be a duplex with three (3) bedrooms in each unit 5 vehicle parking spaces area required, see UDC Table 7.4.4-1. Per UDC Article 7.6.4.B and a Zoning Administration determination the required parking spaces shall meet the requirements of 7.4.6 Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria to include, but not limited to, 7.4.6.K. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. That said as wall heights were not provided to design grade Zoning has added 6” to the provided dimensions to determine perimeter yard setback requirements. Design Development Option (DDO) (UDC 3.11.1) for the duplex: The minimum setback to a side street property line is ten (10) feet (UDC Section 6.4.5.C.1.b). 3. Based on a wall height of 14’-6” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed duplex to the east property line is 9.67’, proposed setback is 4.67’. 4. Based on a wall height of 14’-6” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed duplex to the west property line is 9.67’, proposed setback is 3.3’. The minimum setback to the front street perimeter property line is the greater of twenty (20) feet, or one and one-half (1 ½) the height of the proposed wall ((UDC 6.4.5.C.1.a). 5. Based on a wall height of 14’-6” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed duplex to the south front street property line is 21.75’, proposed setback is 20.0’. Comments for the proposed garage: 6. Per UDC Article 6.6.3.D Accessory structures, except for accessory dwelling units, shall not exceed 12 feet in height, unless attached to a principal structure. Building height is the vertical distance measured from the design grade elevation to the highest point of a flat roof. Provide a dimension form design grade to the highest point of the roof for the garage. If this dimension exceeds 12’-0” a Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required. Garage perimeter yard setback comments: 7. Based on a wall height of 14’-6” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed duplex to the east property line is 9.67’, proposed setback is 4.0’. 8. Based on a wall height of 14’-6” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed duplex to the west property line is 9.67’, proposed setback is 4.0’. 9. Based on a wall height of 14’-6” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed duplex to the west property line is 9.67’, proposed setback is 6.0’. The garage perimeter yard setback reduction can be dealt with one of two ways 1)Per UDC Article 6.6.2.D An accessory structure that exceeds the allowable height of a wall within a perimeter yard and is detached from a principal structure shall comply with the perimeter yard width standards of the principal structure, except that the accessory structure may be built to a parcel line with the consent of the adjoining or, when separated by an alley, adjacent property owner(s). To secure this neighbor setback waiver the following statement must be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the adjacent property owner(s): My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ 2) Include the reduced perimeter yard setbacks in the required DDO for the proposed duplex. The following comments are relative to an application for Architectural Documentation prior to demolition of historic buildings (UDC 3.12.1). The Pima County Assessor’s effective construction date for your building or structure is 1951. The actual construction date may be earlier. Buildings, portions of buildings or structures that are 50 years of age or older must be architecturally documented prior to demolition. Documentation will be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Office before a permit is issued. Demolition (Historic and Older Structures) Application and General Information may be downloaded (PDF) at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/all-application-forms-submittal-requirements Return completed documentation to PDSDHistoric@tucsonaz.gov. Applicant will be contacted within 5 working days if additional materials are required for review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 06/08/2022 | STANTEC | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/08/2022 | DBENOIT1 | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | AT 3RD PARTY OFFICE | Completed |