Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T22CM01230
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2022 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 09/13/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM01230 886 W Paseo De Los Zanjeros – PAD-10 Single Family Residence (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL: September 13, 2022 This site is located in the PAD-10. A single-family residence (SFR) with a home occupancy is a permitted use in this PAD. COMMENT: Resubmit revised drawings and a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Zoning acknowledges that there may have been some confusion as to what use was propose for this site. 1st set of plans showed a “Banquet/Catering Facility and Residence” 2nd set shows “Single Family Residence”. If is my understanding that what is really proposed is a Single-Family Residence with a Home Occupancy use. The following comments are based on a Single-Family Residence with a Home Occupancy use: The following comments were not addressed and no response to Zoning comments were provided 1. Clearly indicate on the plan what is proposed. 2. Cleary demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of PAD-10 Neighborhood General, Secondary Land Uses Permitted, D.4 No more than 50% of all square footage of all buildings on the lot, attached and detached, may be devoted to the home occupation. 3. As a General Note list all Performance Standards list in PAD-10 for a Home Occupation within the Neighborhood General. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Nicholas Ross at Nicholas.Ross@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 09/16/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM01230 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Sub-grade recommendations for engineered fill provided in the geotech report are not incorporated in the structural design details. Please provide revised foundation details after incorporating geotech recommendations for the sub-grade. response from the applicant: See revised Post-Tensioned Details – Sheet PT1.1. Second Review: Requested information could not be located in the response. ITEM OPEN 2. Structural design is based on ASCE 7-10 whereas the design standard needs to be ASCE 7-15 as the base design code is 2018 IBC. response from the applicant: Design Standard Revised – See Sheet PT1.0 Second Review: Revised Structural analysis not provided for review and confirmation. ITEM OPEN. 3. Is there a separate deferred submittal for post-tensioned slab design including the procedures for casting post-tensioned slab? Special Inspections shall be required for the casting of post-tensioned slab. response from the applicant: A Complete Post Tension Design is described in the Plans and Calculations provided. Special Inspections are noted on the Cover Sheet – T1.0 Second Review: information requested not provided for review. ITEM OPEN. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Range hood on 2nd floor shall be exhausted to outdoors sheet M1.2 (IMC2018,505) Complied 2. Provide return air to library sheet M1.2 (IMC2018,603) Complied 3. Provide fire dampers where any duct that penetrates the floor between the first and second floors sheet M1.2 (IMC2018, 607.6.1) Not Complied You have a commercial restaurant on the 1st floor and a residential occupancy on the 2nd floor it must be separated by at least a 1 hour horizontal separation and any duct penetrations must be protected with a fire damper (IMC2018,607.6.1) 4. This occupancy cannot be classified a live/work unit because it is over 3,000 square feet so you must have a 1 hour separation between the first and second floor for sprinkled buildings and a 2 hour for non sprinkled building sheet M1.2 (IBC2018,419.1.1) Not Complied your answer is unclear and indefinite 5. Provide beverage dispenser CO2 quantities and pipe plan (IMC2018,106.3.1) Not Complied not enough information given in your response in respect to the written correction ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: DeniedSecond Plumbing Review: 1). OK 2). Same- Carry 3" up to the branch that serves the 3 compartment sink , the 3 compartment sink needs to discharge to a waste receptor indirectly even if not for food prep, & if it is for food prep each bin of the 3 comp sink needs to be piped to a waste receptor individually. That being said the waste receptor has to be able to handle the discharge of the entire 3 compartment sink load without splashing or flood floor, that can't be accomplished with a 2" drain. -IPC 802.1, 802.1.7, 802.4.1 ( Plan Page P1.0 & P4.0) 3). OK 4). Now that the grease interceptor has been added, a hydromechanical grease interceptor can't be used due to the amount of required fixtures that need to discharge to it on plan page P1.0 & P4.0 -Tucson Plumbing amendments B- Is the washing machine on P1.0 & P4.0 discharging grease laden waste? if no it can't discharge to grease interceptor. - IPC 1003.2 C- P4.0 shows a grease interceptor plan page P1.0 does not, plan pages need to correlate. -IPC 106.3.1 5 thru 7 OK 8). Item P-12 the 3 comp sink needs to discharge to a waste receptor indirectly. -IPC 802.1, 802.1.7, 9). OK 10). SAME-Label the correlating first floor restrooms mens or womens on plan pages 3.0 & P1.0- IPC 403.2 ** these are multi-user restrooms need to be labeled Mens & womens throughout plan set** 11 thru 14 OK 15). SAME-First floor Mens Urinal Bath 1 on P1.0 needs another lavatory. Update all affected pages IPC 403.1.**assembly occupant load for banquet area requires 2 mens & 2 womens lavs , 2nd floor fixtures don't count private area** 16). Now that fixture schedule info has been added to P3.0, the ProFlo toilet PF1723WH is a flush valve type & requires 1" water that doesn't correlate with plan pages P1.0, P2.0 or P3.0 water piping sizes. - IPC 106.3.1, Table 604.5 17 -18 OK 19). SAME-each Hose bib on plan page P1.0 needs a shut off valve. -IPC 606.2 20). SAME-Label the required hot return system on plan page P1.0 -IPC 607.2 ** Hot return system can't be removed as stated in response comments**. 21 thru 23 OK 24). Fire place direct vent roof top termination shown in wrong location on plan page P4.1. -IFGC 106.3.1 25). OK -Fire Place Direct Vent type 26). Added Ansul valve shown in wrong location on plan pages P1.0 & P4.0 should be located ahead of all the appliances beneath hood. -IFGC 305.1 27 thru 31 OK If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/20/2022 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |