Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T22CM00815
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/17/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/28/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM00815 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. There is a discrepancy between the Geotechnical Report, The Structural Calculations submitted and the parameters shown on General Structural Notes Drawing S-0.1. The Drawing calls the Site Class as D. The parameters Fa and Fv used on Lateral Analysis pages of Calculations is 1.42 and 2.4 respectively. The Geotechnical Report calls it Site Class C and these parameters as 1.2 and 1.7 on page 9 under Seismicity. Verify and make revisions as needed and resubmit. 2. The Architectural Drawing A1.3 shows Mechanical Screens around RTU’s. No Details have been drawn how they are Built and supported on top of the Roof. 3. Line of Bridging for Roof Joists are shown on the East Side of the Building. No Lines of Bridging are shown on the Western side of the building Roof. Verify and make revisions. 4. The North Arrow shown on Structural Drawings does not match with the North Arrow shown on Architectural Drawings. Verify and make revisions as needed. Submit a response letter addressing these correction items and provide bubbles on the revisions to the drawings. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. It appears the exhaust outlets are within 10 feet of the mechanical air intakes. Provide evidence of compliance with Section 501.3.1 #3. ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved |
| 03/05/2022 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/07/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T22CM00815 1710 E Tucson Marketplace – PAD-15 New Food Service – DP21-0246 – (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: March 7, 2022 This site is located in PAD-15, Food Service is an allowed use in the PAD. 1. Zoning has reviewed this building plan for compliance with DP21-0246 and although it appears that the floor plans and elevations match Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP has been approved and the comment below has been addressed. 2. Sheet AS1.1 Architectural Site Plan does not match the submitted DP. The configuration of the area north of the building and the crosswalk are not the same. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 03/07/2022 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 03/18/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The DP needs to be approved before the building plans can be approved. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/18/2022 | VVERA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |