Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T22CM00729
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/24/2022 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: May 24, 2022 FROM: Rick Gonzalez, Architect (#26992) COT On-Call Design Professional RE: CD Package Design Review, The Baffert, IID-19-08, T19SA00166 I have reviewed the Baffert Design Modification, submitted April 2022 for the purpose of determining its conformance with design requirements based upon Unified development Code (UDC) Section 5.12 IID (Downtown Core Incentive Infill District); of the required plans and documents submitted to PDSD. 1. Streetscape Design: pedestrian orientation: Architectural elements/details at the 1st two levels – ground floor windows – 50% of frontage, single facade plane 50' max with no architectural detail. ID front doors – graphics, lighting, or similar. Commercial or retail at 1st floor. Sidewalks – maintain with safe widths to adjoining properties with outdoor seating, dining, landscape, if existing maintain bus pull-outs, and safe drive-throughs. -- Complies 2. Shade: 50% of sidewalk areas on Summer Solstice, use trees, arcades, canopies, shade structures historically compatible with context except where not feasible. -- N/A to this Review 3. Development Transition Standards: mitigate noise, odor, vibration relative to residential uses nearby. Maximum height 25-30' and 30' from property lines. Reduce bulk relative to residential, breaking mass, projected windows at 2nd level to reduce views into residential areas. Balconies to orient away or screen from residential areas. Buffer and screen from residential landscaping, walls, decorative features and other 'best practices. Orient service areas away from residential with mitigation methods described above, same with parking areas. Best Practice Alternatives may be offered for compliance. Provide site utility layouts... --N/A to this Review 4. Greater Infill Incentive Subdistrict Modifications of underlying... dimensions, parking, loading, landscaping, NPP... exceptions (25%) 4.1. height – up to 60'; perimeter yard consistent with M S and R plan, sight visibility, traffic safety... -- Complies 4.2 Parking: up to 25% reduction except accessible parking; bike reduced or eliminated based on acceptable requirements. Location: on-site, off site (within a ¼ mile with shared parking agreement. With DOT approval non-residential may have 5 spaces on-street. -- N/A 4.3. Off-street loading: waived/reduced w/PDSD or DOT approval. -- N/A 4.4. Solid waste collection may be modified w/ESD approval. -- N/A 4.5. Landscaping/Screening: NPP may not be modified; Exceptions may be granted if shade is provided for pedestrians/customers on circulation paths, outdoor patios or PDSD Director waiver. Existing landscape, right-of-way trees, green walls/roofs, shade structures are considered in compliance. -- N/A 4.6. Alternative Pedestrian access: code compliant connectivity: public entries to sidewalks. -- N/A General Comments: None This is a minor review to make modifications. Plans were revised to show height of both towers have been clearly labeled, and doors/windows on south elevations are similar in size. Based on review of the Baffert 100% T22CM00729 Forbes Meat Company T.I. Construction Plans Revision 1, I recommend approval as submitted. Sincerely, Rick Gonzalez, Architect RGA |
| 05/31/2022 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 05/31/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved |