Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T22CM00610
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An ASSE 1016 certified thermostatic mixing valve is intended for installation at an individual shower or tub/shower combination. The user has access to flow and/or final temperature controls but no further mixing can occur downstream of the device. An ASSE 1070 thermostatic mixing valve would be more appropriate for hand sinks. Reference: Section 303.2, IPC 2018. 2. If the discharge temperature of the dishwasher will be greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit, show that the temperature rating of the drainage pipe material is suitable for the highest temperature of the wastewater or provide an approved tempering device for the wastewater. Reference: Section 702.5, IPC 2018. 3. Floor sinks in the kitchen shall discharge through a grease interceptor. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. A dishwasher may not discharge through a hydromechanical grease interceptor, but it is required to discharge through a gravity grease interceptor. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. 5. Show how the drain from the existing mop sink relates to the proposed changes to the building drain system. Verify that the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department will allow the drain from the mop sink to bypass a grease interceptor. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 02/01/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide mechanical specifications for the proposed Type I hood. Include all operating requirements and the weight for the hood. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Clarify the support of the proposed Type I hood. Keynote 9 and detail 03 on sheet S-1.0 appear to be contradictory. Provide structural details to show how the back of the hood is to be supported by the new wall. |
| 02/01/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/07/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/09/2022 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet S1.0; Partial Roof Framing Plan: Keynote 9 indicates the back of the hood shall not be suspended from the existing roof framing, but from an existing non-structural wall or support legs bearing on the floor. Please provide a detail that indicates how the back of the hood will be supported. 2. Sheet S1.0: Please provide a structural calculation(s) indicating the existing roof structure is capable of supporting new roof top mechanical units and the new kitchen hood. 3. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 02/17/2022 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/01/2022 | IMONSHI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/01/2022 | IMONSHI1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 03/05/2022 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |