Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T22CM00442
Parcel: 130171290

Address:
4213 E 26TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T22CM00442
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/10/2022 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT:
T22CM00442
4213 E 26th St - R-1
Room Addition (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL: January 31, 2022

This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 – 9.

1. This comment was not addressed. If the owner enclosed this area a permit is required. Based on current aerial photos there is an area under the rear porch that has been enclosed. Zoning was not able to find approved permits for the addition. Show this addition on the plot plan and either provided approved permit documents with the next submitted or include it in this permit.

2. This comment was not addressed correctly. The required neighbors sign of for the property to the north was not provided and is required. As the property to the north is a Condominium Development the sign off must be done by the condominium association. If a sign off cannot be secured a Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be submitted and approved to reduce the setback. As no setback dimension was provided Zoning cannot provide the needed comments for submittal of a DDO. Based on Based on current aerial photos there is what appears to be a storage container along the north property line. Zoning was not able to find approved permits or compliance review for the shed. Show this container on the plan and provide perimeter yard setback dimensions to the north property line. It does not appear that this container meets the minimum 6’-0” required setback. At a minimum a neighbors setback waiver will be required. Per UDC Article 6.6.2.D An accessory structure that exceeds the allowable height of a wall within a perimeter yard and is detached from a principal structure shall comply with the perimeter yard width standards of the principal structure, except that the accessory structure may be built to a parcel line with the consent of the adjoining or, when separated by an alley, adjacent property owner(s). To secure this neighbor setback waiver the following statement must be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the adjacent property owner(s):
My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan.

Signature: _____________________________

Date: _________________________________

3. The proposed storage container is not allowed within the PUE unless you have written permission from all utilities that have rights to the easement. Provide the required written permission with the next submittal.

4. Remove the reference to 5’-0” PUE along the east and west property line as a PUE does not exist there.

DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov.
05/17/2022 SAFEBUILT 2ND PARTY REVIEW REVIEW Approv-Cond Activity Number: T22CM00442


GENERAL:
Provide written responses to all review comments.
Provide a complete plan set.
Provide additional documents as requested by review staff.


STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
Approved


BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS:
Approved


MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
Approved


ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS
Conditionally Approved
Ensure that all electrical receptacles are tamper-resistant.


PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS:
Approved

If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov