Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T22CM00401
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/21/2022 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/24/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING CANNOT APPROVE PLANS UNTIL DP21-0298 IS APPROVED. |
| 03/25/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T22CM00401 & T22CM00402 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: N/A BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved 1. Remove sheets T1.1 and T1.2 that do not have the corrected revisions MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved 1. All violations complied 2. Approved/Subject to field approva ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Conditionally Approved Approved with the following comments EP2.1 POWER FLOOR PLAN: Riser Room detail calls out to be shown on sheet EP4.1, but is actually shown on this sheet. E5.1 ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM & SCHEDULE: Provide conductor sizes and short circuit calculations for each panel. Relocated panels require new calculations as distances and feeders affect these values and this is a Tucson City requirement. EOR response: Existing 120/240V/1PH electrical service to be replaced with new 277/480V/3PH service. Refer to sheet E6.1 for new schedules and E5.1 for revised riser diagrams. Refer to Feeders and Services Schedules on sheet E5.1 for calculations. Refer to sheet E1.1 for locations of services being removed and added. 2nd Review Response by Reviewer (sheet completely redone): F003 calculation seems low, should re-calculate to confirm. However infinite bus calculation would still be below 10 KAIC rating of panel,. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Second Review: 1-3 OK 4). SAME-Plan pages A2.9 roof details, & Plumbing demo pages PD 2.1, PD3.1, &PD3.2 are missing? -IPC A106.3.1 5-7 OK GAS Work Removed 8). OK 9). SAME-Site utility piping plan C6.0 Bldg. Fire, water, sewer and storm connections don't correlate with plan pg P2.1. -IPC A106.3.1 10). SAME-Key note #6 Storm drain, needs to illustrate the routing, sizing, and connection point information on P2.1 & C6.0. -IPC A106.3.1 If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/05/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |