Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PREAPPLICATION LABELS
Plan Number - T21PRE0264
Review Name: PREAPPLICATION LABELS
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/10/2022 | MROSS2 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | 507.1 Required water supply. An approved water supply capable of supplying the required fire flow for the protection shall be provided to premises on which facilities, buildings or portions of buildings are hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. 507.3 Fire Flow. Fire-flow requirements for buildings or portions of buildings and facilities shall be in accordance with Appendix B of the IFC. FIRE HYDRANTS 507.5.1 Where required. Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. Exceptions: 1. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600 ft. 2. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement shall be 600 feet. 507.5.1.1 Hydrant for standpipe systems. Buildings equipped with a standpipe system installed in accordance with Section 905 shall have a fire hydrant within 100 feet of the fire department connections. SECTION 510 EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO COVERAGE 510.1 Emergency responder radio coverage in new buildings. New buildings shall have approved radio coverage for emergency responders within the building based on the existing coverage levels of the public safety communication systems utilized by the jurisdiction, measured at the exterior of the building. This section shall not require improvement of the existing public safety communication systems. Aerial Fire Apparatus Access Roads D105.1 Where required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet, approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. D105.3 Proximity to building. One or more of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located not less than 15 feet and not greater than 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. Automatic fire sprinkler are required in accordance with section 903 of the 2018 IFC. Michael Ross Tucson Fire Department 520-837-7082 Michael.Ross2@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/10/2022 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Completed | Email from: Andy.Vera@tucsonAz.gov To: CDRC Mon 1/10/2022 2:14 PM 1. Recommend two separate enclosure areas for commercial and residential users with compactor type equipment. 2. Identify the path for all users within the development/s to the centralized solid waste enclosure area/s. 3. Provide enclosure detail and dimensions. Refer to TSM 8-01.9.0, Figures 2 – 4. 4. Provide estimated service level based on waste calculations, 0.0057 tons per sf. Refer to TSM 8-01.8.0 5. West of 6th Ave., development must provide 30 degree enclosure offset, TSM 8-01.9.0, Figure 4. 6. Depict 14 ft x 40 ft clear approach in front of enclosure and turning radii’s (36-feet inside, 50-feet outside), refer to TSM 8-01.5.3.B & 8-01.5.3.E 7. Clarify enclosure and service provisions for East of 6th Ave. Feel free to contact me regarding this review. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson -Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor (520) 837-3798 |
| 01/11/2022 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Completed | See in Documents section of PRO: "Tucson Water comments, T21PRE0264" |
| 01/12/2022 | SBEASLE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Completed | See the letter in the "Documents" section of PRO: "Design review comments, 01.12.22" |
| 01/12/2022 | AWARNER1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PROJECT: 6th Ave Assemblage ACTIVITY NO. T21PRE0264 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 1000 S 6th ZONING: 7.6 Landscaping and Screening The Unified Development Code (UDC) requires all new development or an expansion of greater than 25% of an existing development submit a landscape plan, UDC 7.6.2. Preparation of the landscape plan shall adhere to UDC 7.6.4. and Administrative Manual 2-10. • All adjacent streets will require a 10’ street landscape border • 10’ landscape border is required • IID overlay allows modifications to landscape requirements • Trees are required in parking areas at a rate of 1 tree/4 spaces 7.7. Native Plant Preservation An approved Native Plant Preservation Plan Sections 7.7.4 is required or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 is required prior to Grading Plan approval. Commercial Rainwater Harvesting plan is required UDC Technical Standards Manual – Section 4-01.0.0. and Section 5-01.0.0 Landscaping and Screening Adherence to the Low Impact Development Standards outlined in Section 5 of the PCRFCD Design Standards for Stormwater Detention and Retention is required and shall work in conjunction with the Commercial Rainwater Harvesting design. https://webcms.pima.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_6/File/Government/Flood%20Control/Rules%20and%20Procedures/Stormwater%20Detention-Retention/dssdr-manual-board-version-201511.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/NPPO Review at email anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/12/2022 | JVWINKL1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Completed | T21PRE0264 1) All access to the proposed project site will adhere to City of Tucson Access Management Guidelines. 2) Any out of compliance curb access ramps, curb, driveways etc, will need to be updated to current standards. Unused curb cuts, driveways will need to be closed off. This includes any out of compliance brick sidewalk along S 6th Av 3) Northern most driveway for on the west side of 6th Av does not adhere to access management requirements of offset of the E 20th St intersection of 80' 4) Maximum of 2 driveways per 300' on 6th is allowed 5) Southern most proposed driveways on either side of s 6th av will need to align 6) A traffic impact analysis will be required for this development John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/13/2022 | NMARTEL1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal PDSD Zoning Review FROM: Nicholas Martell, Planner PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting - T21PRE0264 Address: Parcels 117090330-390, 11709042A, 117090190, 11709025A, 117090310 Zoning: C-3 Existing Use: Various Proposed Use: Multifamily Residential/Mixed Use TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 12, 2022 COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package. 2. The project is in the C-3 zone within the Greater Infill Incentive District (5.12 UDC).Multifamily residential is permitted in the C-3 without use specific standards. There are various use-specific standards for other commercial and uses per table 4.8-4 UDC. 3. The following development standards can be addressed using the IID: a. Street setbacks b. Parking requirements c. Access 4. The parking calculations provided appear correct per (Table 7.4.4-1 UDC). a. Commercial use (1 per 300) 77 spaces b. Multifamily Residential: It appears that there will be more than 70 units per acre (86). The parking for multifamily will be calculated at 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit. That comes out to approximately 108 spaces required for the multifamily portion of the development. 5. 6th Avenue is a major street and has been fully built out. The rowhomes on the southwest part of 6th avenue may require setback modifications. 6. S. Russell will be considered a developing area and will have setbacks measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. Setbacks from 6th avenue will be measured from the back of curb. Non-residential uses to non-residential zones have 0' setbacks adjacent to interior lots. The setbacks will be measured as follows: a. 21' from back of curb on 6th av b. 0' interior to interior, including the south property line adjacent to 21st street c. S. Russel: 21' from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane 7. Ensure bike parking is provided on the Development Package per table 7.4.8-1 UDC 8. Ensure access standards found in section 7.8 of the UDC and sections 7-01.0.0 and 10-01.0.0 of the Technical Standards Manual are met. 9. Because the entire site is considered commercial, the development is not subject to the 80% lot coverage maximum for the zone. 10. Architectural documentation will be required for any demolitions of structures more than 50 years old. 11. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact me at Nicholas.Martell@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/13/2022 | FRANK PODGORSKI | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD | HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE | Reqs Change | The proposed project is adjacent to the Barrio Santa Rosa National Register Historic District to the west and the Armory Park National Register District to the east. Historic staff is concerned about the proposed height and how it relates to the lower level historic resources. The buildings should be stepped down near the historic districts to reduce their impact. Additionally, the facades that front on to the historic resources should be compatible with the materials, rhythm, and feeling present in the historic district. Historic staff would recommend at courtesy review is done with the Plans Review Subcommittee to receive feed back on the proposed design. |
| 01/13/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | 1. Maximize water harvesting. 2. Site is in a balanced basin. Balanced basin detention and first flush retention are required. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/18/2022 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Needs Review |