Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PREAPPLICATION LABELS
Plan Number - T21PRE0085
Review Name: PREAPPLICATION LABELS
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
04/07/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Completed | 5.4. MAJOR STREET AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) 5.4.2. APPLICABILITY The MS&R standards apply to the following uses on property, any portion of which abuts or is adjacent to a street designated on the City’s or County’s MS&R Plan: A. New structures; B. Changes of use, including new structures occurring on vacant land; C. Uses of land or structures legally existing as of June 27, 1988, that are expanded in floor area, lot coverage, parking, seating capacity, or any other expansion of use, as listed below. Exception. An expansion of off-street parking for a nonconforming existing use that increases the number of spaces to the minimum required by the UDC for that use is exempt from counting toward the 25% expansion: (See Figure 5.4-A.) 1. If the expansion is less than 25%, the MS&R applies to the proposed expansion. The remainder of the use or structure shall be governed by provisions in force at the time of initial approval for the use or structure; 2. If the expansion is 25% or more, the MS&R applies to the proposed expansion and to the parking and landscaping standards that apply to the overall development; or, 3. Expansions that occur after the effective date of the MS&R shall be cumulated in determining the 25% expansion Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-10.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. |
04/27/2021 | MROSS2 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | None |
04/28/2021 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Completed | 230 - 300 pm - T21PRE0085 - 2825 E BROADWAY BL - Site Renewed Health 1. Tucson Water has no objections to the proposed development. 2. Any questions, comments or concerns about these comments may be directed to: Tim Rowe, P.E., Civil Engineer Tucson Water, New Development Section 310 W. Alameda St. P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 837-2106 |
04/29/2021 | JVWINKL1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Completed | T21PRE0085 1) Plans may be found through the following link on sheets 109 and 111. https://www.tucsonaz.gov/apps/maps-and-records/construction-plans/details/I-2015-018 John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
04/29/2021 | LSHAMIS1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal PDSD Zoning Review FROM: Loran Shamis; Planner, MBA PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting – T21PRE0085 Address: 2825 E Broadway Bl Parcel(s): 125091130 Zoning: C-1 Existing Use: Personal service Proposed Use: Personal service addition TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 29, 2021 COMMENTS: 1.Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package. 2.The proposed use, personal service, is permitted in the C-1 zone. Use specific standard 4.9.4.T.1 applies. 3.The proposed expansion is over 25% of GFA (32.4%), triggering the site to meet full code compliance. 4.Parking - non-residential uses with a parking formula of one space per 300 square feet GFA or less intense formula that occupy a structure listed individually on the National Register of Historic Places or listed as a contributing property are exempt from Section 7.4.4.B, Minimum Number of Motor Vehicle Spaces Required, provided the historic designation of the contributing structure is maintained. (UDC, Section 7.4.5.D. Exemption based on Maintenance of Historic Structure). 5.UDC, Section 7.4.6.K. Use of Street or Ally for Maneuvering Area states a “street or alley cannot be used for maneuvering directly into or from any parking space located wholly or partially outside the public right-of-way”. The site cannot use the alley as access. a.Follow up comment: see comment number 4. Site design may eliminate the need to access the site from the alley 6.The proposed addition must meet the required minimum setback to the north – 1.5 the height of the proposed adjacent wall. Reference UDC, Section 6.3.4. Dimensional Standards. 7.The proposed use requires 2 short-term bicycle parking spaces and 2 long-term bicycle parking space (UDC, Section 7.4.8). Demonstrate compliance with the bicycle parking space design in UDC, Section 7.4.9. 8.Include an ADA accessible pedestrian circulation path at least 4’ wide that connects all areas of development and to the adjacent street. Demonstrate compliance with the Technical Standards Manual, 7-01.4.0, Location and Design Standards. 9.Sunshine Mile Overlay going to Mayor and Council in May for approval and adoption – this may present opportunities for reduced setbacks and parking and possibly accessing from the alley. For more information regarding how this proposal might take advantage of the optional overlay, please review the latest draft https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/boards-committees-commissions/ZoningExaminer/SMD_revised_020321.pdf a. Follow up comment: Contact Maria Gayosso (Maria.Gayosso@tucsonaz.gov) or Koren Manning (Koren.Manning@tucsonaz.gov) 10.The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions, please contact me at Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov. |
04/29/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | No comments |