Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: PREAPPLICATION MEETING
Plan Number - T21PRE0078
Review Name: PREAPPLICATION MEETING
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/12/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | 1. Site is not in balanced or critical basin. As a part of the rezoning, Engineering will request the equivalent of balanced detention and 5-year threshold retention for the whole site based on vacant land. 2. Water harvesting will need to be maximized. |
| 04/13/2021 | JOHN BEALL | M&C Public Hearing 4 Plan Amendment | Set M&C Public Hearing Date | Active | |
| 04/13/2021 | BILLIE LEE | COMMENTS | COMMENTS | Active | |
| 04/13/2021 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | Rezoning Pre-Submittal Transmittal FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Rezoning Pre-submittal meeting T21PRE0078 Address: 475 N Granada Av Parcel(s): 11619175B and others Existing Zoning: C-2 and I-1 Proposed Zoning: C-2 Existing Use: Traveler’s Accommodation, Lodging Proposed Use: Multifamily Development TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 13, 2021 COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package. 2. Development standards: 44 units/acre, 40 ft height limit 3. Proposed use and use-specific standards: Multifamily development 4. Perimeter yard setbacks: 0 ft 5. Applicable overlays: Infill Incentive District (IID) 6. Major Streets and Routes Plan: Granada Av, existing width 7. Applicable street setbacks: 21 ft or wall height measured from back of future curb (Granada) and measured from outside edge of adjacent travel lane (Franklin) 8. Parking requirements: 364 spaces, 1 space per unit in Downtown Parking District 9. Bike parking requirements: 44 short-term, 219 long-term 10. Landscape requirements can be discussed further with Andy Connor at andrew.connor@tucsonaz.gov. 11. Additional comments: It appears the demolition of existing building is proposed. The County Assessor lists the year built as 1960. As such, historical architectural documentation will be required as part of demolition approval. 12. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions please contact me at elisa.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 04/29/2021 | MROSS2 | FIRE | REVIEW | Completed | None |