Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T21CM09955
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/14/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T21CM09955 7309 E Placita Mina – R-1 Attached Carport & Detached Canopy (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 14, 2022 This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.5 – 9. 1. The property line dimensions shown for the north and east line are not correct, also provide the property dimensions for the south property to include all arcs and lines. Review the Vista Del Sahuaro final plat found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/apps/maps-and-records/subdivisions/details/1542, for the correct dimensions. 2. Provide a dimension from the centerline of E Placita Mina to the south property line and a dimension from the street side of curb to the south property line. Review Paving Plan I-837 sheet 7 found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/apps/maps-and-records/construction-plans/details/I-837, for correct dimensions. 3. Based on the street dimensions above it does not appear that the dimensions shown on the plot plan from the proposed carport to the south property line and curb are correct. 4. Provide a lot coverage calculation that meets the requirements of Unified Development Code (UDC) Article 6.4.3 and the example found on the Residential Plot Plan Requirements found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Residential_Plot_Plan_Requirements.pdf. 5. Show the zoning of the parcel and all adjacent parcels on the plot plan. 6. Show all utilities on the plot plan. 7. Based on current aerial photos there is some type of structure along the east property line. Show this structure on the plan and include it in the lot coverage calculation. 8. The dimension shown for the alley is not correct. Review the final plat stated in comment 1 and correct. 9. Based on the heights provide for the proposed carport a DDO is not required for the setback to the east property line as shown on the plan. 10. A DDO may not be used to reduce a perimeter yard setback to less than 1’-0”. That said a DDO cannot be used for the proposed canopy setback to the north property. Per UDC Article 6.6.2.D An accessory structure that exceeds the allowable height of a wall within a perimeter yard and is detached from a principal structure shall comply with the perimeter yard width standards of the principal structure, except that the accessory structure may be built to a parcel line with the consent of the adjoining or, when separated by an alley, adjacent property owner(s). To secure this neighbor setback waiver the following statement must be provided on the plot plan and be signed and dated by the adjacent property owner(s): My Name is____________________ and I am the owner of the property located at_______________________. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed________ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan. Signature: _____________________________ Date: _________________________________ If you are not able to secure the neighbor setback waiver a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required for the setback as shown on the plan. Until the above comments are addressed, specifically comment 2, Zoning cannot provide specific comments for the needed DDO for the front street perimeter yard setback. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 01/14/2022 | SSHIELD1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/27/2022 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Completed |