Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T21CM09863
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/25/2022 | LSHAMIS1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC Transmittal FROM: Loran Shamis PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T21CM09863 SFR - Attached master bedroom and detached storage addition (1st Review) 962 S Duke Dr TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 11, 2022 DUE DATE: January 13, 2022 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. The site is zoned R-1 , and the proposed use is single family residential (UDC 11.3.7) which is a permitted use in your zone, subject to use specific standards 4.9.7.B.5-.9 (Table 4.8-2). 01. COMMENT: The proposed detached storage unit is not meeting the minimum setback requirement. The minimum setback requirement for R-1 is the greater of 6' or 2/3 the highest point of the adjacent wall measure from the exterior of the proposed structure to the property line. See UDC 6.4.5 for application standards. 02. COMMENT: Per UDC 6.6.2.D, an accessory structure may be built to a parcel line with the consent of the adjoining property owner(s). To reduce the minimum required setback, include the following language on the site plan along with the name and signature for the property owner(s) at 952 S Duke Dr. My name is ________ and I am the owner of the property located at _______. I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to the structure being located or constructed _____ feet from the property line as depicted on the site plan Signature: __________ Date:_________ 03. COMMENT: If the setback requirement is not being met towards the southwest (adjacent to the alley) include the same statement above with the name and signature for property owner(s) at 1001 S Colgate Dr. 04. COMMENT: Provide the height of the detached storage. Per UDC 6.6.3.C, the accessory structures shall not exceed 12' in height, unless attached to a principal structure. 05. COMMENT: Include the vehicular use area in the lot coverage calculation. See UDC 6.4.3 for application standards. For questions regarding Zoning comments, please contact me at: Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp |
| 01/25/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/08/2022 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T21CM09863 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Rafters on storage shed: 14-foot span i. ID type of wood being used for rafters ii. ID if celling will be installed 2. Set back from property line is only 2 feet for storage building i. Smart siding is being installed with no fenestrations ii. Is this set back approved for City of Tucson? 3. Master bedroom addition: 1. ID type of wood being used for rafters 2. ID if celling will be installed 3. Provide all rafter spans BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Rafters on storage shed: 14-foot span i. ID type of wood being used for rafters ii. ID if celling will be installed 2. Set back from property line is only 2 feet for storage building i. Smart siding is being installed with no fenestrations ii. Is this set back approved for City of Tucson? 3. Master bedroom addition: 1. ID type of wood being used for rafters 2. ID if celling will be installed MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved |