Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T21CM09559
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/02/2022 | LBOWERS1 | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | PIMA COUNTY - ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | PLEASE CONTACT PC ADDRESSING TO HAVE UNIT NUMBERS ASSIGNED TO THE NEW UNITS. PLEASE SUBMIT CONFIRMATION FROM PC ADDRESSING WHEN RESPONDING TO COMMENTS IN ORDER TO CLEAR THIS ISSUE. ADDRESSING CAN BE CONTACTED AT 520-724-9512 OR ADDRESSING@PIMA.GOV |
| 03/15/2022 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 03/15/2022 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T21CM09559 1265 W Roger Rd – R-3 Add four (4) additional units to site. (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL: March 14, 2022 This site is located in the R-3 zone (UDC 4.7.12). A Multi-family is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with DP22-0034 but cannot approve the building plans until the DP is approved by all review agencies. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Zone1.desk@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 03/21/2022 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This is a change of use and occupancy and fire sprinklers shall be installed per IFC 2018, Chapter 9. Jennifer Peel-Davis Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 Fire Plans Examiner |
| 03/31/2022 | DBENOIT1 | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T21CM09559 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Now that the building code data has been provided. Please indicate which code is being used (IBC vs IEBC) One is free to use either code but not both, unless specifically referenced by the IBC. If the IEBC is the desired approach, one must choose 1 of 4 compliance paths. These compliance paths cannot be used in combination with each other in accordance Section 301.3 of the IEBC. It is important to note that the Chapter 3 requirements apply to all compliance methods. 1. Prescriptive compliance method: Chapter 5: The prescriptive approach is the simplest method to follow in terms of code requirements, but is also the most conservative approach. 2. Work area compliance method: Chapters 6-12:The work area compliance method provides the greatest amount of benefits to the building owner and design professional. This is the easiest route to take. It is much more conservative. 3. Performance compliance method: Chapter 13: This method focuses on what the building is required to do, rather than prescribing how it is to be constructed. This method requires the design profession to work more closely with the owner of the building, as well as the code official, to ensure that design meets specific requirements for the occupants and not simply the prescriptive requirements. 4. Previously adopted code: Section 301.3 Exception 1. This method utilizes a previously adopted code under which the area in question was most recently built or modified; this requires the code official’s approval. Please clearly indicate which compliance method has been chosen and provide a narrative outlining the applicable code requirements. Depending on the compliance method chosen fire sprinklers may be required. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Approved PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/29/2022 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed |