Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T21CM08892
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/17/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/23/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T21CM08892 2914 S Cottonwood Ln - R-1 New SFR – Unit 2 (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: November 23, 2021 This site is located in the R-1 zone (UDC 4.7.8). A single-family residence (SFR) is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.1 - .9, & .11. 1. The setbacks listed under “SITE REVIEW” are not correct. Per Unified Development Code (UDC) Article 6.4.5.C.1 the street perimeter yard setback is 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, whichever is greater. Interior setbacks, north, west & south are based on UDC Table 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, R-1 Zone, Residential Use to Residential Zone the required perimeter yard setback is 6’-0” or 2/3 the height of the exterior wall, greater of the two. 2. Perimeter yard setbacks are based on a measurement from design grade to the highest point of the exterior wall UDC Article 6.4.5.B & Figure 6.4.5-A. As height dimensions were not provided from design grade to the highest point of the wall, Zoning cannot verify if perimeter yard setbacks are met. 3. The code reference, 3.2.6.5.B.2, shown under “FRONT PER STREET FRONTAGE” is not correct. This reference is a Land Use Code (LUC) reference and has not been applicable since 2011 remove this reference from the plan. Also the reference to “REAR PER DEV. DES. ‘BB” is no longer applicable. 4. Provide a lot coverage calculation that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.3 and the example shown on the Residential Plot Plan Requirements found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Residential_Plot_Plan_Requirements.pdf. 5. Provide a calculation on the plan that demonstrates that the requirements of UDC Article 4.9.7.B.3 is met, One dwelling must be at least 25% smaller than the other dwelling. 6. Based on the number of bedroom proposed on site, demonstrate how the vehicle parking requirements are met for UDC Article 4.9.7.B.7. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 11/29/2021 | AWARNER1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Needs Review | CDRC TRANSMITTAL PROJECT:2 SFR ACTIVITY NO. T21CM08890/92 ADDRESS/PARCEL: 2914 S Cottonwood Ln ZONING: R-2 7.7. Native Plant Preservation An approved Native Plant Preservation Plan Sections 7.7.4 is required or a request for an exception from the Native Plant Preservation requirements in accordance with Sections 7.7.3.D.3 & .4 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Admin. Manual Section 2-11.0.0 is required prior to Grading Plan approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Anne Warner, RLA PDSD Landscape/NPPO Review at email anne.warner@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/13/2021 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T21CM08892 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. For facilitating a shorter back check time, please provide updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment updates; revisions are processed if changes occur after the permit is issued. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2018 International Residential Code and 2018 International Energy Conservation Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: The City of Tucson adopted the 2018 IRC with amendments on 1/1/2019. Show the current code reference on the plans. GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. Show compliance with the Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment Ordinance adopted by the City of Tucson Ordinance #11844 on 6/22/2021. Include a 40 ampere 240 volt dedicated branch circuit with a NEMA 14-50R receptacle for charging an electric vehicle at a proposed parking space. ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. Provide the Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment 40 ampere 240 volt dedicated branch circuit with a NEMA 14-50R receptacle and label the circuit “EV Ready”, N1104.2.1. Include the Electric Vehicle load entry (typically 7680 watts) in the electrical load calculations (continuous demand) like the HVAC entry, N1104.2.2. Please contact the plans reviewer if you have any questions: Ken Van Karsen (520) 837-4912 PDSD-Residential@tucsonaz.gov City of Tucson Residential Plan Review |