Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T21CM08581
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/18/2022 | PCAMARE1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 05/18/2022 | PAUL CAMARENA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T21CM08577, T21CM08578, T21CM08579, T21CM08580, T21CM08581, T21CM08582, T21CM08583, T21CM08584, T21CM08585 Multi-Family (3rd Review) 4267 N 4TH AV Zoning R-2 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 18, 2022 This site is located in the R-2 zone (UDC 4.7.9). A multi-family is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use-Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10. Comment: Provide the setbacks dimension for building 5, Provide a dimension on the elevation drawing from design grade to top of wall. It appears that the proposed setback is 11'5" based on a scaled measurement. The minimum setback is the greater of Ten (10) feet, or three/fourths (3/4) the height of the structure’s wall facing each interior property line (Table 6.3-2.A). Based on a wall height of 19’-6” the required perimeter yard setback from the proposed Townhome to the west south property line is 14’-8" proposed setback is 11’-5”. A Design Development Option (DDO) must be submitted and approved to reduce the required setback, DDO application and requirements can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf. A DDO is a separate submittal from the building plan and shall be submitted at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd-filedrop, using the Submission Type “Zoning Administration”. If you have questions about the DDO application or process please contact Mark Castro at Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov. Comment: Provide the setbacks information for the Ramada/Storage. Provide a building height measurement 6.4.4.A. Building height is the vertical distance measured from the design grade elevation to the highest point of a flat roof; to the deck line of a mansard roof; or to the middle (between the eave and ridge ) of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof, except as follows: (See Figure 6.4.4-A, Measurement of Building Height .) If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at (520)837-4986 or by email Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/19/2022 | DBENOIT1 | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T21CM08581, T21CM08578, T21CM08579, T21CM08580, T21CM08577, T21CM08582, T21CM08583, T21CM08584, T21CM08585 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved 1. The response to the structural correction items indicate that the Geotechnical Report will be submitted and it was not submitted in this submittal. The Inspector to verify info provided on Sheet S0.0 and the Structural Calculations matches with the Geotechnical Report. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Approved MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Conditionally Approved 1. Applicant shas stated in his response that there is no pool or pool equipment room on this project to review. 2. Approved/Subject to field approval ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Conditionally Approved E1.03 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRICS: Comment and calcs meet exterior lighting requirements. No electrical issues E3.03 ENLARGED UNIT 2 ELECTRICAL PLAN: Comment only on Note #2. Do you really want to use Aluminum for the range circuit? No electrical issues PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied Third Review: 1). OK 2). OK, Civil plan set page 6 states civil work permitted separetly 3). PLUMBING PLANS MISSING PLAN PAGE P3.2, per sheet index A0.01 4 thru 7 OK 8). OK-Per response Sheet Fire System permitted Separately If you require additional clarification regarding these comments, please contact Doris Benoit at doris.benoit@tucsonaz.gov |