Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW - COMMERCIAL
Permit Number - T21CM06128
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW - COMMERCIAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/20/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/20/2021 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 08/20/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T21CM06128 210 E 7th St Love Burger @ the Corbett Block (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL: August 19, 2021 This site is located in the I-1 zone (UDC 4.7.29). Food Service is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-5). 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with DP20-0125 and although it appears that the building matches what is shown on the DP, until the building plans are approved by the Design Professional, Zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 08/20/2021 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/30/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This project is within a mapped flood hazard area and requires a Floodplain Use Permit (FUP.) Please start a new FUP at our permit application web page: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp. Instructions: 1. Is this for a new or existing activity application? - Please select New Application. 2. Submission Type - Select Floodplain Use Permit. 3. Project Name - Enter a name for your project. 4. Select Street Name from the list. You can type the first two letters or number to get closer to your choice in the list. Then select the rest of the address in the boxes provided. 5. Type of Permit - Select Commercial or Residential (Residential is for work on single family residences and duplexes.) 6. Complete the Applicant Info. (Note APA# is for applicants with an advance payment account. Leave blank is you do not have an APA account. 7. Complete the Contractor, Owner and Architect/Engineer sections as applicable. 8. Supporting Documentation Upload - Provide a complete cost estimate for the project. You may also provide additional documents you think will be helpful. 9. Sign the application and submit. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/31/2021 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: August 30, 2021 FROM: Corky Poster, Architect/Planner PHASE OF REVIEW: Application Review CD Love Burger Comments (8-30-21) are always in purple. The CD’s are consistent with previous DP comments CD set dated 7-27-21 IID STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: UDC Section 5.12.8 General IID Zoning Option Design Standards A. Streetscape Design 1. Pedestrian Orientation a. Architectural details at first two floor levels. Comment: On the east end of the site, the project designers have done an extraordinary job in developing architectural details along the pedestrian area property line at the first-floor level. While it is true that the new building proposed for the site is a simple functional building, it becomes a background for the interesting patio dining area along 7th Street and to a lesser extent, 5th Avenue. This reviewer appreciates the line of columns along 7th Street and 5th Avenue to maintain the street frontage. On the west end of the site, the Corbett building has been respectfully responded to with the maintenance of the historic north and west elevation. The landscaping proposed under the historic west portico enhances the rhythm of the dominant columns. Similarly, the landscape and hardscape corner of 6th Avenue and 7th Street has been very well done. The placement of the “Entry to Speakeasy,” tables in area “3”, and the (apparently) future “Hotel Lobby” also provide an abundance of architectural detail. This standard has been met. This standard has been met in the CD set. c. No single plane of façade longer than 50’ Comment: This requirement is met on all sides of the project. This standard has been met in CD set. d. Front doors visible from the street and highlighted. Comment: This requirement is met on all sides of the project. This standard has been met in CD set. e. Uses such as Commercial Services and Retail Trade that encourage street level pedestrian activity are preferred. Comment: This standard has been met. This standard has been met in CD set. g. Drive-through. Comment: There is no drive-through and the curb-side parking for pick-up on the east side of the site has been well done. This standard has been met in CD set. 2. Shade: 50% of all sidewalks and pedestrian access paths at 2:00 PM on June 21 Comment: Based on the detailed Shade Study submitted I have verified that the developers and designers have met this shade requirement. They have done so by the combination of the historic arcade on the west side of the Corbett Building, the shade structure on the east side of Building 2 and the trees shown on the Shade Study on the north and east side of the site. This standard has been met in CD set. 1. Building Placement: Comment: As per 5.12 WTA-1, The “Build-to” line is zero meaning the “building” should be located at the property line along 7th Street and 5th Avenue. In this case, the “building” is located further back to the south and to the west. However, it is this reviewer’s opinion that the covered structured patio on the north and east effectively functions as part of the “building” and provides a strong measure of pedestrian and street life, a goal of a previous section of the IID. Nonetheless, it appears as if the columns of the outdoor patio sit several feet south and west of the actual property line. Given the fact that the Corbett Building sits directly on the north property line, it would be a stronger urban design gesture and match the language of 5.12 WTA-1 if the patio columns were directly ON the north and east property lines. The revised submission extends the column line to the north on to the north property line. Quoting from the Comment Response document: “Patio has been extended to align with the north property boundary creating the required zero build-to line. Reference page 6 and page 74 of revised IID for revised covered patio graphics. Also reference page 71 of revised IID for final site Development Plan depicting new covered patio location.” This responds to my comment and makes it a stronger project. Thank you. The Construction Documents set shows the columns on the property line as requested above. 2. Building Heights, Floor Uses: As per Table 5.12-WTA-2: · The maximum building height is 160’ or 14 stories. The proposed structure is well below that height. Comment: No action required. This standard has been met in CD set. 4. Building Massing Standards: Comment: The Standards listed in Table 5.12-WTA-4 have been met. No action required. This standard has been met in CD set. Submitted by: Corky Poster, Architect/Planner, Poster Mirto McDonald City of Tucson, Design Professional |
| 09/20/2021 | STANTEC | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 09/20/2021 | DBENOIT1 | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | AT 3RD PARTY OFFICE | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/20/2021 | DBENOIT1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 09/20/2021 | DBENOIT1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/20/2021 | DBENOIT1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |