Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T21CM05754
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
857 W 26TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO

Permit Number - T21CM05754
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/09/2021 LSHAMIS1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC Transmittal

FROM: Loran Shamis
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: T21CM05760
New SFR (1st Review)
226 E King Rd

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 29, 2021

DUE DATE: July 29, 2021

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

The proposed use is single family residential (11.3.7.A.5), which is permitted in the R-2 zone (Table 4.8-2), and use specific standards are 4.9.7.B.6, .9, and .10 are applicable

01. COMMENT: Correct the elevations to demonstrate the height of the wall from grade. The required setback to the west, south and east (and to the north where property does not abutt the street) are 6' or 2/3 the height of the proposed wall measured at finished grade not finished floor, the greater applies, measured from the proposed exterior wall to the property line.

02. COMMENT: The front street perimeter yard is not meeting the required setback. The property is in an established area street perimeter setbacks - the required setback to the north and the portion of the building adjacent to the street perimeter yard, requires a minimum 20' or 1.5 the height of the proposed wall at finished grade, the great applies, measured from the proposed exterior property line to the proposed exterior wall.

03. COMMENT: The setback adjacent to the street perimeter setback can be reduced through an additional and separate application process called the Design Development Option (DDO). See the following link to learn more about the design development option: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf

For questions regarding Zoning comments, please contact me at: Loran.Shamis@tucsonaz.gov
To resubmit your plans for additional review, please visit: https://docs.tucsonaz.gov/Forms/tucsonpermitapp
08/09/2021 PCAMARE1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Paul Camarena
PDSD Engineering Review Section

PROJECT: NEW SFR
857 W 26th ST
T21CM05754

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 21, 2021

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Engineering Review Section comments were addressed.

1. A grading-only development package is required. Please prepare and submit a DP application through the online permit application process. The grading plan must include cut and fill quantities, existing and proposed grades, limits of grading and tops and toes of slopes.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena at Paul.Camarena@tucsonaz.gov


RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and structural plans
08/09/2021 KEN VAN KARSEN BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Reqs Change T21CM05754
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS

Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, please provide updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment updates; revisions are processed if changes occur after the permit is issued.

SCOPE OF REVIEW:

The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2018 International Residential Code and 2018 International Energy Conservation Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

1. All SFR and Duplex plans submitted after March 1, 2009 require a solar water system, or future installation preparation City of Tucson Ordinance #10549 with one of the following provisions: ½”control conduit and two ¾” copper piping for water with rooftop termination; straight 3” capped sleeve; or an accessible attic (clear path 30” wide x 30” high) over the water heater. Show appropriate notation.
2. All SFR and Duplex plans submitted after July 1, 2009 require a solar photo-voltaic system, or future installation preparation City of Tucson Ordinance #10549 .
a. Show a minimum 300 SF clear solar-ready zone on a roof or framing plan, T103.3. Model plans should show four typical south facing roof surfaces.
b. Label a double breaker space for future Photo Voltaic on the panel schedule opposite end from the main/supply side, T103.9. (completed)
3. All construction drawings submitted after June 1, 2010 for one- or two-family dwellings must provide gray water utilization or preparation, Ordinance #10579/11089 revised July 9, 2013. The ordinance revision now requires a gray drain line discharge from one fixture for a one story dwelling. Additional gray fixture drains are optional. Show a second clothes washer standpipe plumbed to an exterior wall above grade when feasible, or a bathing fixture drain looped 3’ beyond an exterior wall below grade before connection to the building drain. See details at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes-ordinances/Grey_Water_Options_FINAL_.pdf

SITE PLAN:

1. Show the building code reference 2018 IRC.
2. Show the septic size or the Pima County Septic permit number.

FLOOR PLANS:

1. Show the location of a minimum 22” x 30” attic access. Attic access is required for areas exceeding 30 SQ FT with a minimum of 30” of headroom and located in a hallway or readily accessible space, R807.1

SECTIONS - DETAILS:

1. An unvented roof assembly requires an air-impermeable rigid insulation material with a minimum R-5 value applied correctly to either side of the roof sheathing, R806.5. Show a roof design with insulation types and minimum thickness for meeting the condensation control requirement and the minimum total insulation value of R-38.

MECHANICAL PLANS:

1. Provide (an HVAC system with fresh air intake) whole-house mechanical ventilation, or controlled exhaust with a calculated airflow rate, R303.4; N1103.6 & M1505.4. Show the system and appropriate flow rate setting on the plans. A four bedroom dwelling of 1501 – 3000 SF requires a 75 CFM continuous setting.

ELECTRICAL PLANS:

1. Use Table E3705.5.3 for sizing 15, 20 & 30 AMP branch circuit conductors and protection ratings. Update the wire size shown on the panel schedule.

OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE

1. Show the proposed fixture as full cut-off FCO style or provide an Outdoor Lighting Calculation including all exterior fixtures on the property for determining exterior lighting limits. Adjustable security light fixtures are unshielded, not FCO.

INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE:

1. Energy Certificate: (Mandatory) place near the indoor furnace or in utility room, N1101.14. Add notation to plans.

Please contact the plans reviewer if you have any questions:
Ken Van Karsen
(520) 837-4912 PDSD-Residential@tucsonaz.gov
City of Tucson Residential Plan Review
08/18/2021 AWARNER1 NPPO REVIEW Passed
08/19/2021 JPEELDA1 FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change The house under roof is 4,111 sq ft it will require two items:
1) We need a letter from Tucson Water showing that the closest fire hydrant can get 1,750 gpm for 2 hours.
2) We need to know the distance as the hose lays not the crow flies from the hydrant to the furthest part of the house.

Questions:
Jennifer Peel-Davis
Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov
520-837-7033