Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW - RESIDENTIAL
Permit Number - T21CM05002
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW - RESIDENTIAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/14/2021 | AWARNER1 | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/14/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Roof downspout and splashpad locations don't seem to match between the building plans and the approved DP. Please revise the building plans to match the approved DP and/or provide dimensions to clarify. Stephen Blood (520) 837-4958 Stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/14/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T21CM04990-4996, 4998, 500005003, 5005-5007 West 18th Townhomes Townhomes – C-3 TRANSMITTAL: July 14, 2021 This site is located in the C-1 zone (UDC 4.7.22). Single family attached is an allowed use in this zone (Table 4.8-4). 1. Until the building plans are approved by the Design Professional Zoning cannot approve the plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 07/22/2021 | MGAYOSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Design Professional Review Comments Date: 21 July 2021 From: R. Fe Tom, AIA, Design Professional Related Activity Number: # DP18-0283 HPZ-19-54, T19SA00221 Application Review Comments for 18 W 18, Development Plans: DP18-0283, Construction Document: dated 3 July 2020 I have reviewed the documents based upon past IID submittals and approvals. 1. DP Review dated: 28 Jan 2021 and 17 Aug 2020: Walls at Contributing Structure: a. Owner had agreed to provide 4' max high wall height wall along 18th Street and a max wall height of 6' along Russell Ave. Provide details to meet compliance b. From Civil, Landscape and Architectural drawings: It appears that the historic structure was not part of this permit. We did not find details in the drawings. c. Document shall note that the development of contributing structure shall meet IID compliance. 2. DP Review dated: 23 March 2020: The following items were approved by the DP from the Development Plan dated 19 Feb 2020: a. Propose building use to include Single Family, attached (duplex) Multifamily, Retail Sales and Alcoholic Beverage Sales. Complies b. The gross area of the subdivision is decreased from 25,704sf to 24,365sf.The total number of lots has been decreased from 19 -17. Lot division have been modified. Central common area removed, instead area is allotted to each property. Complies c. North Property Setback shall be 21.1. Complies d. Per IPP: 10 parking spaces shall be provided. Complies e. Provide ADA aprons along 7th Ave and increase the planting area. Complies f. Provide increase planting area for trees along North property line. Complies g. Shade Study modified to provide 50% compliance.Complies 3. DP Review dated: 8 Aug 2019: The following are requirements from Barrio Historical Architectural Guidelines a. Height and proportions: Comply b. Setbacks: Comply c. Roof Forms / Elements: Comply d. Porches: Comply e. Exterior Wall Material: Complies f. Doors and Windows: Guidelines do not allow aluminum windows, doors, or screen frames. g. Site Elements: Comply h. Landscaping: Comply i. Signs: Comply: No signs shown on drawings 4. DP Review dated 8 August 2019: The following are from IID Major review comments a. Pedestrian- orientation: The historic structure was not included in the scope of the construction drawings. Notes will need to be added to CD to show IID compliance for maximum 4’ high wall on 18th Street and maximum 6’ high wall on Russell Ave. b. Development Transition Standards: Complies. A setback of 30’ was originally shown. However, this set back was later approved for 27’. c. Building Bulk Reduction: Complies d. Mitigation of Services areas: The historic structure was not included in the scope of the construction drawings. Notes will need to be added to CD to show IDD compliance of 5.12.8.B.3. Owner stated that there will be alcohol sales, but we assume that there will be no consumption of alcohol on the retail/mercantile site. e. Parking: Complies 5. DP Review dated 8 August 2019: The following are from Greater Infill Incentive Subdistrict review comments: complies For approval by DP, the following will need to be provided or revised on the Construction Drawings: 1. For the Historic Building: Provide IID requirement even if the Historic building is not part of the scope of work. 2. For the new residential buildings: provide revisions that are not in compliance as noted above for the Construction Drawings. ================================== |
| 08/04/2021 | ARUIZ1 | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 3rd party Building Review complete and approved. Pending remaining reviews. |
| 08/04/2021 | WILDAN | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | AT 3RD PARTY OFFICE | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2021 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |