Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T21CM04377
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/07/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Per conversation roof access shall not be the ladders. Roofs shall connect and be continual. Fire department access lanes shall have signs per our amendments. Fire riser and FDC locations shall be moved adjacent to the hydrants. Gates shall be supplied with an Opticom and KNOX gate key switch. If you have any questions please contact me: Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033 |
| 06/07/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Tucson Water will not allow water meters to be manifolded to achieve additional capacity. A demand of 170 GPM will require a 3-inch water meter. |
| 06/16/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: BLDG #1 - T21CM04334, BLDG #2 - T21CM04376, BLDG #3 - T21CM04377 & BLDG #4 - T21CM04378 1002 E 36th St. Multifamily TRANSMITTAL: March 15, 2021 This site is located in PAD-15. Multifamily is a permitted use. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with DP21-0078 and although the building plans appear to match the DP until the DP is approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans. 2. Sheet A1.02 references 4B sheet A1.12, this detail calls out for a shade structure over the mail boxes. This structure is not shown on DP21-0078 and will need to be added to the DP. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 06/16/2021 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T21CM04334, 4376-4378 GENERAL: Provide written responses to all review comments. Provide a complete plan set. Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied All Calculations shall be sealed and signed by Professional Engineer registered with State of Arizona per Section 107.1 of International Building Code 2018. All three Volumes of Calculations submitted are not sealed and signed. 2. Balcony guards are to be designed for the loads provide in IBC 2018 Section 1607.8.1. 3. Designer is to coordinate venting and drainage hole requirements for HSS tube members that are galvanized using the hot-dip galvanizing process. Provide for plugs as needed. AWS D-19.0 calls for welds on galvanized steel to be free of zinc. Field welds on galvanized parts requires the removal of the zinc coating in the area of weld. Provide zinc paint (approved by the galvanizer) and apply as required to the weld and steel area to provide protection. 4. Roof drainage and secondary drains are to comply with IBC 1502.1 5. Non-load bearing walls require a deflection track or details to allow for the relative lateral deflection of the structural members. 6. Structural general notes are to include any components of the building that may be considered deferred submittals. IBC Section 107.3.4.1 requires deferred submittals to be approved by the building official.. If items will be deferred the plans are to clearly note the following per IBC Section 107.3.4.1: * To be reviewed by design professional in responsible charge. * Design professional shall affix a notation that the deferred items are in general conformance with their design of the building. * They shall be submitted for review by the building official. * Shall not be installed until approved by building official. 7. Refer to the Structural Calculations submitted, Vol. I page 180 of 193 for a Skewed Beam 8.75 x 13.5 has a Stress Ratio of 1.394 and a Deflection Ratio of 133. Revise the Beam Section to bring the Stress and Deflection under the allowable limits. 8. Refer to Structural Calculations, Vol 2. On page 112 of 115, F4 Footing at Moment Frame. Bearing Capacity of 2.5 ksf is used. Verify with Soil Report and GSN’s on Structural Drawing. Submit a response letter addressing these correction items and provide bubbles on the revisions to the drawings. BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Sheet A0.51: One location statess 27,000 sq ft for allowable tabular sq. ft. and in other locations it states 36,000. Correlate the correct allowable tabular sq. ft. 2. Sheet A0.52: Sq. ft. calculation are not correlated correctly on the D.9 building type. It lists a building type not present on this project. 3. Sheet A0.55: Provide egress plan for the amenity and fitness space. 4. Sheet A0.15: The door in the stair encroaches into the stairwell. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1.Provide mechanical exhaust to kitchens in all units (IMC2018,403.3.2.3) 2. Provide duct smoke detectors for fcu1 & 2 (IMC2018,606.2.2) 3. All penetrations through fire rated horizontal assemblies shall be protected in an approved manner (i.e. dryer, bathroom exhaust duct) (IMC2018,607.6.2) 4.Provide detail plan on bathroom and dryer exhaust ducts penetrating fire rated assemblies (IMC2015,106.3.1) 5.Correct office area square footage in amenity room first and second floor and correct ventilation rate for both rooms (IMC2018,106.3.1) ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied E0.2 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS : Need to provide Comcheck report for interior and exterior lighting. E4.01 ELECTRICAL UNIT PLANS - STUDIO: Panel in Unit SA Floating next to bathtub, mounted in door swing. Not NEC compliant. Telecom panel is also hanging off door swing. Receptacles in bathroom also floating/not on wall. Note 7 calls out for Junction box, but details show nonfused disconnect. Correct note or redo detail. Common note on all Unit Plan sheets. E4.04 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - AMENITY BLDG: Receptacles and data drops floating in open area next to FC-1 E5.02 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAMS: Missing, not in set, Not reviewed. E6.02 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: Panel H4B missing MLO, AIC, and NEMA rating. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied City of Tucson Amendments to the 2018 International Plumbing Code: Appendix B RATES OF RAINFALL FOR VARIOUS CITIES. REVISE appendix by ADDING “Tucson…3.0” under “Arizona”. You are using 1” for your storm drain calculations and you should be using 3.0”. Demonstrate compliance |
| 06/16/2021 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review | |
| 07/07/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Development Package DP21-0078 must be approved first. 2. Clearly show how primary roof drains are designed to keep sidewalks flood-free for up to a 10-year event. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/07/2021 | VVERA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |