Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T21CM04377
Parcel: 132130660

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG

Permit Number - T21CM04377
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/07/2021 JPEELDA1 FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change Per conversation roof access shall not be the ladders. Roofs shall connect and be continual. Fire department access lanes shall have signs per our amendments. Fire riser and FDC locations shall be moved adjacent to the hydrants. Gates shall be supplied with an Opticom and KNOX gate key switch. If you have any questions please contact me: Jennifer.Peel-Davis@Tucsonaz.gov 520-837-7033
06/07/2021 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change Tucson Water will not allow water meters to be manifolded to achieve additional capacity. A demand of 170 GPM will require a 3-inch water meter.
06/16/2021 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL

FROM: PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT:
BLDG #1 - T21CM04334, BLDG #2 - T21CM04376, BLDG #3 - T21CM04377 & BLDG #4 - T21CM04378
1002 E 36th St.
Multifamily

TRANSMITTAL: March 15, 2021
This site is located in PAD-15. Multifamily is a permitted use.

1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with DP21-0078 and although the building plans appear to match the DP until the DP is approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans.

2. Sheet A1.02 references 4B sheet A1.12, this detail calls out for a shade structure over the mail boxes. This structure is not shown on DP21-0078 and will need to be added to the DP.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov.
06/16/2021 SAFEBUILT 2ND PARTY REVIEW REVIEW Reqs Change Activity Number: T21CM04334, 4376-4378

GENERAL:
Provide written responses to all review comments.
Provide a complete plan set.
Provide additional documents as requested by review staff.

STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
Denied
All Calculations shall be sealed and signed by Professional Engineer registered with State of Arizona per Section
107.1 of International Building Code 2018. All three Volumes of Calculations submitted are not sealed and signed.
2. Balcony guards are to be designed for the loads provide in IBC 2018 Section 1607.8.1.
3. Designer is to coordinate venting and drainage hole requirements for HSS tube members that are
galvanized using the hot-dip galvanizing process. Provide for plugs as needed. AWS D-19.0 calls for welds
on galvanized steel to be free of zinc. Field welds on galvanized parts requires the removal of the zinc
coating in the area of weld. Provide zinc paint (approved by the galvanizer) and apply as required to the
weld and steel area to provide protection.
4. Roof drainage and secondary drains are to comply with IBC 1502.1
5. Non-load bearing walls require a deflection track or details to allow for the relative lateral deflection of the
structural members.
6. Structural general notes are to include any components of the building that may be considered deferred
submittals. IBC Section 107.3.4.1 requires deferred submittals to be approved by the building official..
If items will be deferred the plans are to clearly note the following per IBC Section 107.3.4.1:
* To be reviewed by design professional in responsible charge.
* Design professional shall affix a notation that the deferred items are in general conformance with their design of
the building.
* They shall be submitted for review by the building official.
* Shall not be installed until approved by building official.
7. Refer to the Structural Calculations submitted, Vol. I page 180 of 193 for a Skewed Beam 8.75 x 13.5 has a
Stress Ratio of 1.394 and a Deflection Ratio of 133. Revise the Beam Section to bring the Stress and Deflection
under the allowable limits.
8. Refer to Structural Calculations, Vol 2. On page 112 of 115, F4 Footing at Moment Frame. Bearing Capacity of
2.5 ksf is used. Verify with Soil Report and GSN’s on Structural Drawing.
Submit a response letter addressing these correction items and provide bubbles on the revisions to the drawings.

BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS:
Denied
1. Sheet A0.51: One location statess 27,000 sq ft for allowable tabular sq. ft. and in other locations it states 36,000.
Correlate the correct allowable tabular sq. ft.
2. Sheet A0.52: Sq. ft. calculation are not correlated correctly on the D.9 building type. It lists a building type not present
on this project.
3. Sheet A0.55: Provide egress plan for the amenity and fitness space.
4. Sheet A0.15: The door in the stair encroaches into the stairwell.

MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
Denied
1.Provide mechanical exhaust to kitchens in all units (IMC2018,403.3.2.3)
2. Provide duct smoke detectors for fcu1 & 2 (IMC2018,606.2.2)
3. All penetrations through fire rated horizontal assemblies shall be protected in an approved manner (i.e. dryer, bathroom
exhaust duct) (IMC2018,607.6.2)
4.Provide detail plan on bathroom and dryer exhaust ducts penetrating fire rated assemblies
(IMC2015,106.3.1)
5.Correct office area square footage in amenity room first and second floor and correct ventilation rate for both rooms
(IMC2018,106.3.1)

ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS
Denied
E0.2 ELECTRICAL LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS : Need to provide Comcheck report for interior and exterior lighting.
E4.01 ELECTRICAL UNIT PLANS - STUDIO:
Panel in Unit SA Floating next to bathtub, mounted in door swing. Not NEC compliant. Telecom panel is also hanging off
door swing. Receptacles in bathroom also floating/not on wall.
Note 7 calls out for Junction box, but details show nonfused disconnect. Correct note or redo detail. Common note on all Unit
Plan sheets.
E4.04 ELECTRICAL POWER PLAN - AMENITY BLDG:
Receptacles and data drops floating in open area next to FC-1
E5.02 ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAMS: Missing, not in set, Not reviewed.
E6.02 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: Panel H4B missing MLO, AIC, and NEMA rating.

PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS:
Denied
City of Tucson Amendments to the 2018 International Plumbing Code: Appendix B RATES OF RAINFALL FOR VARIOUS
CITIES. REVISE appendix by ADDING “Tucson…3.0” under “Arizona”. You are using 1” for your storm drain calculations and
you should be using 3.0”. Demonstrate compliance
06/16/2021 SSHIELD1 COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Needs Review
07/07/2021 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Development Package DP21-0078 must be approved first.
2. Clearly show how primary roof drains are designed to keep sidewalks flood-free for up to a 10-year event.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/07/2021 VVERA1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed