Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T21CM03111
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
04/27/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
04/28/2021 | SAFEBUILT | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Activity Number: T21CM03111 GENERAL: o Provide written responses to all review comments. o Provide a complete plan set. o Provide additional documents as requested by review staff. STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS: NA BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Provide a detailed occupant load count of each space and coordinate requirements accordingly. If the primary use is unconcentrated chairs and tables the factor is 15 net. The note states that the owner to limit occupant load to 299. This not permitted by the IBC and would need to be approved as an alternative method of design by the building official. 2. Table 1006.2.1 is an accurate reference as this project is required to have more than one exit. 3. Provide door hardware information on doors 100A and 100B ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Denied E0.0 ELECTRICAL NOTES: No electrical issues ED1.0 ELECTRICAL DEMO PLAN: No electrical issues E1.0 ELECTRICAL CEILING PLAN: No electrical issues E1.1 ELECTRICAL SWITCHING PLAN: No electrical issues E2.0 ELECTRICAL POWER/MECH PLAN: No electrical issues E3.0 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS PLAN: No electrical issues E4.0 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES: Remove 'AND GAS PIPE' from grounding note. This is in violation of NEC 250.52.B.1 Suggest to provide fuse table with let thru current nomograph to obtain lower Short circuit let thru currents for the 200 amp 120/240V KAIC panel values. 65 KAIC ratings for smaller 200-amp panels/breakers may be difficult to obtain. Some breakers misidentified as single pole when they appear to be 2 pole breakers. MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Submit COMcheck plan review and inspection worksheet information per Version 4.1.5.1. 2. Show above ceiling return air noncombustible material requirements per 2018 IMC 602.2. 3. Provide rooftop equipment piping construction attachment details per 2018 IBC 1604. 4. Show return air boot, concentric vent, and gas vent support details per 2018 IMC 603.10. 5. Provide new rooftop condenser units convenience receptacle location per 2017 NEC 210.64. 6. Show refrigeration coolant systems classification types and locations per 2018 IMC 1103. 7. Provide piping and duct work support maximum spacing information per 2018 IMC 305.4. PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS: Denied 1. Show existing building sewer main size and clean out locations per 2018 IPC 710.1. 2. Provide new building sewer main sizes and clean out locations per 2018 IPC 708.1. 3. Show public fixture equipment count in fixture schedule per 2018 IPC 709.1. 4. Provide above ceiling hot water heater construction details per 2018 IPC 504.1. 5. Show condensate disposal termination construction details per 2018 IPC 314.2.1 revise. 6. Provide new plumbing piping tests and inspections information per 2018 IPC 321.1. 7. Show existing and new fire separation construction repair details per 2018 IBC 714.1. |
04/28/2021 | PCAMARE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
04/28/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
05/05/2021 | SSHIELD1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
05/05/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T21CM03111 (1st Review) Change of Use – Retail to Civic Assembly 975 W Prince Rd TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 5, 2021 DUE DATE: May 7, 2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. As this is a change of use and the parking change is significant 1 space per 300 gfa to 1 space per 100 gfa and you are proposing using UDC Article 3.3.3.H provide a copy of the required recorded affidavit, see UDC Article 3.3.3.H.9.a or a copy of the executed lease/rental agreement with the required verbiage shown under UDC Article 3.3.3.H.9.b. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov |