Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T21CM02423
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/25/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Sheet C4.4 # 45 says that bollards are staying and they shall be removed for fire department aerial access. Please note that the SW staircase shall house the FDC on your plns. Please not that fire sprinkler and fire alarms are deferred submittals Please note that the building shall be tested for Emergency Responder Radio Coverage prior to final and results provided to TFD Please show fire department Aerial access on your plans and idicate fire lane signs and markings Provide note stating that you will be providing exterior two-way communication at the elevator landings Jennifer Peel-Davis |
| 04/01/2021 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/01/2021 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 04/05/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the civil drawings referenced on sheet MP11.1 showing the site sewer and the storm drain connected to the proposed parking garage. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. What is the purpose of the 4” building sewer shown on sheet MP11.1? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 3. The first-floor horizontal rainwater leader serving the storm water drains on column lines G and H is scheduled for 715 GPM but at a slope of 1/8” per 12”, the capacity limit for an 8” RWL is only 714 GPM. Reference: Section 1106.2, IPC 2018. |
| 04/05/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/05/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/13/2021 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. Provide more detail for the lighting controls and branch circuits assigned for the lighting indicated on each lighting plan. Verify luminaire quantity's shown in the lumen calculations. For example: the lighting plans show 20 ‘K’ type luminaires, and the lumen calcs show 72. Please clarify. Is there existing exterior luminaires accounted for in the lumen calculations? If yes, please indicate on the plans or lumen calculations. How was the project parcel size of 1.05 acres calculated? Ref; 2018 IBC 107.2.1, 2017 NEC, Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. |
| 04/15/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNTIL APPROVED BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL ZONING CANNOT APPROVE THE BUILDING PLANS. 4/16/2021 - MARIA GAYOSSO - DESIGN REVIEW: On Sheets A21 (PDF electronic sheet # 34), and A22 (PDF electronic sheet # 35), please label the colors on each facade, as specified in the design package approved under T20SA00320. |
| 04/15/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/16/2021 | IMONSHI1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |