Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T21CM02266
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/12/2021 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/19/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not resolved. No envelope COMcheck provided. [Initial comment: Demonstrate energy code compliance for the building envelope using calculations based on the current code (e.g. provide COMcheck). Reference: Sections C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2018. 2. Comment not resolved. Electrical lighting calculations have not been changed. [Initial comment: Show how one of the "Additional Efficiency Package Options" (C406, IECC 2018) is to be accomplished. The mechanical COMcheck calls for reduced lighting power but the electrical lighting design does not show compliance with the requirements of Section C406.3, IECC 2018. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2018. 3. Comment not resolved. The kitchen drawings do not include sufficient construction data for the walk-in cooler and the walk-in freezer. [Initial comment: Show that the walk-in cooler and the walk-in freezer meet the construction requirements of Section C403.10.2, IECC 2018. 4. Comment not resolved. The kitchen drawings do not include energy efficiency data for the walk-in cooler and the walk-in freezer. [Initial comment: Show that the walk-in cooler and the walk-in freezer meet the efficiency requirements of Section C403.10.2.1, IECC 2018. |
| 10/19/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed; no civil plans provided. [Initial comment: An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, etc.). Provide the civil plans showing the installation of the water service to the building, the installation of the building sewer, and the installation of the proposed fountain as part of the building plan set. Reference: Sections 107.2.1 and 107.2.6, IBC 2018.]. 2. The calculations are incorrect but the submitted scupper dimensions are adequate. The scuppers and overflows are not labeled on the roof plan, coordinate with the elevation. [Initial comment: Provide roof drainage and scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Reference: Sections 1101.7, 1106, and 1108, IPC 2018.] 3. The calculations are incorrect but the submitted scupper dimensions are adequate. Three scuppers are noted per the calculations and the roof plan but only two scuppers are shown on the elevation drawing. [Initial comment: Provide dimensions for the roof scuppers and overflow scuppers. Reference: Sections 1106.5 and 1108.3, IPC 2018.] 4. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Complete the kitchen equipment schedules to show the quantities of each type of equipment will be installed. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.] 5. Comment not resolved; the drawings are not coordinated. Ice maker (K470, on P1.1, K414 on E2.0) is shown in same location as Hood 1 for "Just Baked Oven", K535 on M-2.0. [Initial comment: Coordinate the plumbing plans with the equipment locations shown in the kitchen plans. For example, sheet P1.1 shows SCW being supplied to the ice machine but in the location of an oven while no SCW is being supplied to the location of the ice machine. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.] |
| 10/22/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T21CM02266 3435 E Speedway Blvd. Food Service TRANSMITTAL: October 22, 2021 This site is located in the C-2 zone (UDC 4.7.21). Food Service is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-4) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.4.M.1 and 4.9.13.P. Provide a detail comment response letter with the next submittal. 1. This comment was not addressed. The square footage for this building listed on DP20-0274 is now listed at 1,950, Cover sheet of the plan lists it at 2,175, clarify the difference. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with DP20-0274 and it appears that there is a discrepancy in the square footage shown on the building plan 2,175 and the DP 1,850. The building and DP should match, clarify the difference. Also until the DP is approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans. 2. Zoning cannot approve the building plan until the DP is approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 10/29/2021 | SBLOOD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |