Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T21CM02266
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/16/2021 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/30/2021 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet T-1.0; Code Check: The proposed building area indicates 2175 SF. However, in determining the occupant load, an area of 3110 SF is indicated. Please coordinate. 2. Sheet T-1.0; Applicable Codes: Please add the 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1 Accessibility Code to the list. 3. Sheet A-1.0; Floor Plan: Please provide calculations on this sheet indicating the number of accessible seats required per the IBC Section 1109.11. 4. Sheet A-8.1a; Elevation 7c: Please add a vertical grab bar per the ICC/ANSI Figure 604.5.1. 5. General: Please provide a Special Inspections Certificate with Parts A and B completed. 6. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 04/01/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, etc.). Provide the civil plans showing the installation of the water service to the building, the installation of the building sewer, and the installation of the proposed fountain as part of the building plan set. Reference: Sections 107.2.1 and 107.2.6, IBC 2018. 2. Provide roof drainage and scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3” per hour. Reference: Sections 1101.7, 1106, and 1108, IPC 2018. 3. Provide dimensions for the roof scuppers and overflow scuppers. Reference: Sections 1106.5 and 1108.3, IPC 2018. 4. Complete the kitchen equipment schedules to show the quantities of each type of equipment will be installed. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 5. Coordinate the plumbing plans with the equipment locations shown in the kitchen plans. For example, sheet P1.1 shows SCW being supplied to the ice machine but in the location of an oven while no SCW is being supplied to the location of the ice machine. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. |
| 04/01/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the building envelope using calculations based on the current code (e.g. provide COMcheck). Reference: Sections C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2018. 2. Show how one of the “Additional Efficiency Package Options” (C406, IECC 2018) is to be accomplished. The mechanical COMcheck calls for reduced lighting power but the electrical lighting design does not show compliance with the requirements of Section C406.3, IECC 2018. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2018. 3. Show that the walk-in cooler and the walk-in freezer meet the construction requirements of Section C403.10.2, IECC 2018. 4. Show that the walk-in cooler and the walk-in freezer meet the efficiency requirements of Section C403.10.2.1, IECC 2018. 5. Why does sheet M1.0 show a 4” gas vent for an electric water heater? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. |
| 04/01/2021 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/08/2021 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/12/2021 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The Development Package must be approved first. |
| 04/13/2021 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T21CM02266 3435 E Speedway Blvd. Food Service TRANSMITTAL: April 13, 2021 This site is located in the C-2 zone (UDC 4.7.21). Food Service is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-4) subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.4.M.1 and 4.9.13.P. 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with DP20-0274 and it appears that there is a discrepancy in the square footage shown on the building plan 2,175 and the DP 1,850. The building and DP should match, clarify the difference. Also until the DP is approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 04/26/2021 | LSHAMIS1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/27/2021 | IMONSHI1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |