Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Permit Number - T21CM00009
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/NPPO
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/21/2021 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/27/2021 | PCAMARE1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/28/2021 | SAMUEL ROGERS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Samuel Rogers PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T21CM00009 Remodel Addition - 1st Review 1521 E 10Th St. TRANSMITTAL DATE: 01/28/2021 DUE DATE: 01/19/2021 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 01. COMMENT: Per Unified Development Code (UDC) TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 Zones. In the R-3 zone the minimum perimeter yard setback for the south and west property lines is 6’ or 2/3 the height of the exterior wall, greater of the two. The proposed addition appears to be 14’ in height requiring a setback of 9.24’. The setback can be reduced with the Design Development Option (DDO) process. For information on the DDO process see: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC_8.11.20.pdf 02. COMMENT: The submitted site/plot plan is missing several required elements. Submit a site plan showing the full site and with lot coverage calculation, zoning of adjacent properties, etc. on the next submittal. For site/plot plan requirements see: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Residential_Plot_Plan_Requirements.pdf 03. COMMENT: Reorient the site plan so that either the north or east side of the property is oriented towards the top of the page. 04. COMMENT: The height of the proposed addition’s wall, (measured from design grade to the top of the parapet,) is required to determine the required perimeter yard. Either: a. indicate that the elevations are to scale by providing a scale, b. indicate the height of the wall on the elevations drawing, or c. add a table to site plan indicating the wall heights of the proposed addition (see example in the link provided in Comment 2). 05. COMMENT: The height of the structure is measure from design grade to the top of the structure, Parapet walls and safety railings are not included in the height calculation, provided they do not exceed the allowable height by more than four feet. Provide the height of the design grade on the elevation drawings and the height of the parapet. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Samuel Rogers at Samuel.Rogers@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Building Plans |
| 01/28/2021 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Clarify if the water heater requires an upgraded gas pipe size for serving the increased demand over a storage unit. |