Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Number: T20PRE0053
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: PRESUBM MTG

Plan Number - T20PRE0053
Review Name: PRESUBM MTG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/21/2020 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Completed The Engineering Section has no concerns for the small addition to building D. If any changes are made to the parking or landscape within the flood hazard area, a floodplain use permit will be required.
04/22/2020 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Completed No adverse comments. Standard requirements will apply. Additional analysis for crash barrier is required.
04/22/2020 SSHIELD1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Completed Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-10.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.
04/22/2020 SBEASLE1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Completed Tucson Water has no comments.

Tim Rowe, Sr. Engineering Associate
Tucson Water, New Development Section
310 W. Alameda St.
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, AZ 85726-7210
(520) 837-2106
04/23/2020 GDAURIA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Completed
04/23/2020 ELISA HAMBLIN ZONING REVIEW Completed CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal
PDSD Zoning Review

FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Principal Planner

PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting – T20PRE0053
Address: 1390 W Speedway Bl
Parcel(s): 11522002A
Zoning: R-1
Existing Use: Civic Assembly
Proposed Use: [same]

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 22, 2020

COMMENTS:
1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package.
2. The Civic Assembly use is not permitted in the R-1 zone. As such, this center is considered a nonconforming use. The proposed classroom expansion would not increase the level of nonconformity of the site.
3. The development package will need to provide an expansion calculation for this addition. The expansion calculation is cumulative from the last time the site met full code compliance. If the cumulative expansion is more than 25%, full code compliance will be required. This may require pedestrian, landscape, or circulation improvements.
4. The development package will need to demonstrate this addition does not trigger additional parking or bike parking on the site.
5. Other development standards appear to be met.
6. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards.

If you have any questions please contact me at elisa.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966.