Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PRESUBMITTAL MTG
Plan Number - T20PRE0029
Review Name: PRESUBMITTAL MTG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/10/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/12/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | 1. This is not within a flood hazard area. 2. The proposal is not a significant increase in impervious area. 3. Maximize water harvesting in new and existing landscape areas. |
| 02/18/2020 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Completed | No adverse comments |
| 02/19/2020 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Completed | 150 pm - T20PRE0029 - 800 W AUTO MALL DR - SiteGrading Jim Click Nissan No comments. Tucson Water Fabien A. Elenes, Engineering Associate P.O. Box 27210, Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 (520) 837-2202, Fabien.Elenes@TucsonAZ.gov |
| 02/20/2020 | NMARTEL1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal PDSD Zoning Review FROM: Nicholas Martell; Planner PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting - T20PRE0029 Address: 800 W Auto Mall Dr. Parcel(s): 10408086C Zoning: C-3 Existing Use: Vehicle Rental and Sales Proposed Use: Vehicle Rental and Sales TRANSMITTAL DATE: 02/20/2020 COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package. 2. The use is Vehicle Rental and Sales which is permitted in the C-3 zone, subject to use specific standard 4.9.9.G.1 & 2 regarding delivery and loading operations, and delivery truck parking. 3. Zoning classification to the north, east and south is C-3 and require setbacks of 10' or ¾ the height of the building. The zone to the west is Pima County MU zoning, which also requires 10' or ¾ the height of the building. The setbacks appear to be met, but dimensions and building heights will be required. 4. Parking appears to meet UDC standards. Please show which spots are designated for public use. More information about the use of each individual building will be required for an accurate count. Refer to table 7.4.4-1 under retail vehicle sales. 5. Pedestrian access (sidewalk, crosswalk) is required from each street which fronts the property 6. Refer to table 7.4.8-1 for Retail Trade Use Group short and long term bike parking. More information is required to calculate total bike parking. 7. Provide expansion calculations and the last approved site plan in order to determine the extent of the expansion. 8. Upon review of the 25% expansion standards in the UDC for parking and pedestrian access, the cutoff date for an approved development site plan is April 1, 1969. It does not appear that there were existing buildings before that date. Refer to 7.4.3.E in the UDC for parking standards, and 7.01.2.0 in the Technical Standards Manual for pedestrian access standards. 9. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions please contact me at nicholas.martell@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-6933. |
| 02/25/2020 | SBEASLE1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | Review was not completed |