Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PRESUBMITTAL MTG
Plan Number - T20PRE0024
Review Name: PRESUBMITTAL MTG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/04/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | T20PRE0024 1. Not floodplain. Not balanced or critical basin. Detention/Retention not required. 2. Maximize water harvesting. |
| 02/04/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Completed | The standards in this Section 7.6.4.B apply to all developments that provide more than four motor vehicle parking spaces Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-10.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. |
| 02/07/2020 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Completed | * R2s require fire sprinklers. * Sprinkler system must be monitored; requiring a dedicated function alarm panel. * These items are deferred plan submittals to TFD |
| 02/07/2020 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Completed | No adverse comments. |
| 02/12/2020 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal PDSD Zoning Review FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Principal Planner PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting - T20PRE0024 Address: 2545 E Spring St Parcel(s): 11207153A, 11207155A Zoning: R-2 Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Multifamily development TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 12, 2020 COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package. 2. The proposal is to develop a multifamily development consisting of 3 units on a vacant site. Multifamily development is a permitted use in the R-2 zone subject to use-specific standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10. 3. The proposal for three units requires 8,712 sq ft of lot area, which appears to be met. 4. A total of 7 parking spaces are required, 1 of which must be handicap accessible. Parking spaces are required at 18 ft x 8.5 ft. A Parking Design Modification Request (PDMR) may be an option for reduced parking space dimensions. 5. Lot coverage is limited to 75%. The proposal appears to meet this standard. Note, patios and porches do not count towards lot coverage. 6. Setbacks to the north and west are 10 ft or ¾ of the wall height. A Design Development Option (DDO) may be an option for reducing the required setback to the east. 7. The tree planted in the middle of the parking area on the west reduces the required parking area access lane below the standard of 24 ft. Correction required or a PDMR may be applicable. 8. Sidewalks accessing the units from the street are required to be 4 ft in width. 9. A lot combination processed with Pima County is required. 10. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions please contact me at elisa.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. |
| 02/12/2020 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Completed | 150 pm - T20PRE0024 - 2545 E SPRING ST - Site Triplex, new construction " Since there are no mains nearby the proposed main extension will be required for Tucson Water to serve this parcel. " Please contact Ray Munoz at 837-2207 in the Tucson Water New Services Section to discuss: o The number of water service lines, water meters, and meter sizes, necessary to serve this development. o The advantages and disadvantages of installing the necessary water meters via Tucson Water's Job Order Contract (JOC) process. |
| 02/13/2020 | GDAURIA1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | * R2s require fire sprinklers. * Sprinkler system must be monitored; requiring a dedicated function alarm panel. * These items are deferred plan submittals to TFD |