Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T20CM06385
Parcel: 13502032A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T20CM06385
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/17/2020 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
1. Provide a grounding electrode system for this building connected to the new panel as required per NEC art 250.32.
Ref; 2018 IBC sec, 107.2.1, 2017 NEC, 2018 IECC, City of Tucson Commercial Plan Submittal Requirements.
09/17/2020 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
09/17/2020 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Passed
09/17/2020 JPEELDA1 FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/18/2020 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Hand sinks in the kitchen are allowed to connect to the sanitary waste system instead of the grease waste system only if each sink has a sign posted above it that states, "HANDWASH SINK ONLY! NO FOOD PREPARATION OR DISHWASHING ALLOWED." Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Notes on sheet P-2.4 state, "PROVIDE 3" RWL & ORWL DN IN WALL & TERMINATE AT DOWNSPOUT DP-1." What is DP-1 and how are you terminating a roof drain leader at a downspout? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.
3. Coordinate detail 2/A-4.0 plan of the roof drain/overflow drain assembly with the orientation of the assembly shown on the roof plans. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.
4. Share a cut sheet of the specified roof drain/overflow drain assembly with the architect so detail 2/A-4.0 can be drawn correctly. Reference: Sections 1102.6 and 1108.3, IPC 2018
09/18/2020 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.2.4, IMC 2018 (the hood hanging weight plus the weight of personnel working in or on the hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2018.
2. The mechanical plan shows high velocity supply diffusers in close proximity to the face of the Type I hood. Verify that the location and type of the air outlets complies with the hood manufacturer's installation instructions and does not reduce the effectiveness of the exhaust system. Reference: Sections 304.1 and 508.1, IMC 2018.
3. Show that the hood installation complies with Section 507.2.6, IMC 2018 with regard to a smooth, cleanable, non-absorbent, and non-combustible material installed between the hood and the wall, and extending 18" beyond the hood.
09/23/2020 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
09/23/2020 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Sheet A-1.0; Code Review (Exit Travel Distance): The Sanctuary exit travel distance indicates a maximum actual distance of 135', while the Exiting Plan 3 indicates 185'-0". Please coordinate.
2. Sheet A-1.0; Code Review (Exit Travel Distance): The North, South, and East Buildings exit travel distance indicate a maximum actual distance of 109'-8", while the Exiting Plan 1 indicates 116'-6". Please coordinate.
3. Sheet A-1.0; Reference Site Plan: An enlarged detail references 14/A-6.0. Is that reference correct? Please verify.
4. Sheet A-1.0; Code Review (Plumbing Calculations): The calculations indicate 1446 occupants, while the occupant load calculation indicates 1449 (590 + 859). Please coordinate.
5. Sheet A-4.0; Roof Plan: Roof hatches are located on this plan in two separate locations. One hatch indicates Keynote 305, and the other hatch indicates Keynote 309. Please revise those Keynote references.
6. Sheet A-4.0; Roof Plan: Please indicate the distance on this plan of the roof hatch (Sount Building) to the exterior wall.
7. Sheet A-5.1; Detail 1: At the bracing for the interior partition, please indicate the size and quantity of connectors for the bracing to the partition and to the roof.
8. Sheet S4.0; Detail 107: Please provide a dimension (or add a reference) for the location of the epoxy bolt above the top of slab. Should Note 3 indicate concrete grout added to the existing masonry wall at the epoxy bolt locations?
9. General: Please provide a Special Inspection Certificate with Parts A and B completed. This form may be found at www.tucsonaz.gov/PDSD.
10. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments.
09/25/2020 NICHOLAS ROSS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: Mallory Ress
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: T20CM06385 BLDG #3
Renovation of 4 buildings, excavation for drainage and add square footage (9.05% increase) (1st Review)
6620 E 22nd St
TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/25/20

COMMENTS: A Development Package submittal is required for this project. The Building Permit cannot be issued until a Development Package has been issued.


01. COMMENT: Please submit a development package application. The requirements for a development package can be found here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Submittal_Requirements.pdf

02. COMMENT: Expansion calculation for all additions from last time site met full code compliance is required to be shown on the development package.

03. COMMENT: Include a parking calculation and demonstrate that parking requirements are met.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Mallory Ress at Mallory.ress@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Development Package