Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T20CM06384
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/17/2020 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. 1. Provide a grounding electrode system for this building connected to the new panel as required per NEC art 250.32. Ref; 2018 IBC sec, 107.2.1, 2017 NEC, 2018 IECC, City of Tucson Commercial Plan Submittal Requirements. |
| 09/17/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/17/2020 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/17/2020 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/18/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Notes on sheet P-2.4 state, "PROVIDE 3" RWL & ORWL DN IN WALL & TERMINATE AT DOWNSPOUT DP-1." What is DP-1 and how are you terminating a roof drain leader at a downspout? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 2. Coordinate detail 2/A-4.0 plan of the roof drain/overflow drain assembly with the orientation of the assembly shown on the roof plans. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 3. Share a cut sheet of the specified roof drain/overflow drain assembly with the architect so detail 2/A-4.0 can be drawn correctly. Reference: Sections 1102.6 and 1108.3, IPC 2018. |
| 09/18/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/23/2020 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 09/23/2020 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet A-1.0; Code Review (Exit Travel Distance): The Sanctuary exit travel distance indicates a maximum actual distance of 135', while the Exiting Plan 3 indicates 185'-0". Please coordinate. 2. Sheet A-1.0; Code Review (Exit Travel Distance): The North, South, and East Buildings exit travel distance indicate a maximum actual distance of 109'-8", while the Exiting Plan 1 indicates 116'-6". Please coordinate. 3. Sheet A-1.0; Reference Site Plan: An enlarged detail references 14/A-6.0. Is that reference correct? Please verify. 4. Sheet A-1.0; Code Review (Plumbing Calculations): The calculations indicate 1446 occupants, while the occupant load calculation indicates 1449 (590 + 859). Please coordinate. 5. Sheet A-4.0; Roof Plan: Roof hatches are located on this plan in two separate locations. One hatch indicates Keynote 305, and the other hatch indicates Keynote 309. Please revise those Keynote references. 6. Sheet A-4.0; Roof Plan: Please indicate the distance on this plan of the roof hatch (Sount Building) to the exterior wall. 7. Sheet A-5.1; Detail 1: At the bracing for the interior partition, please indicate the size and quantity of connectors for the bracing to the partition and to the roof. 8. Sheet S4.0; Detail 107: Please provide a dimension (or add a reference) for the location of the epoxy bolt above the top of slab. Should Note 3 indicate concrete grout added to the existing masonry wall at the epoxy bolt locations? 9. General: Please provide a Special Inspection Certificate with Parts A and B completed. This form may be found at www.tucsonaz.gov/PDSD. 10. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 09/25/2020 | NICHOLAS ROSS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Mallory Ress PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T20CM06384 BLDG #2 Renovation of 4 buildings, excavation for drainage and add square footage (9.05% increase) (1st Review) 6620 E 22nd St TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9/25/20 COMMENTS: A Development Package submittal is required for this project. The Building Permit cannot be issued until a Development Package has been issued. 01. COMMENT: Please submit a development package application. The requirements for a development package can be found here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Submittal_Requirements.pdf 02. COMMENT: Expansion calculation for all additions from last time site met full code compliance is required to be shown on the development package. 03. COMMENT: Include a parking calculation and demonstrate that parking requirements are met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Mallory Ress at Mallory.ress@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Development Package |