Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T20CM06306
Parcel: 132190080

Address:
2075 E BENSON HY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T20CM06306
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/25/2020 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The minimum energy efficiency requirements for the split-system (CU/FC-1 and CU/FC-2) and single package (HP-1 and HP-2) heat pumps are shown in Table C403.3.2 (2). Correct the cooling capacity shown for HP-2, 5434 kBtu/h is equal to 5,434,000 BTUH.
2. The COMcheck envelope compliance shows the wall assemblies with R-20 continuous insulation but the building and wall sections show R-20 batt (i.e. cavity) insulation. Coordinate the envelope COMcheck descriptions with the building design.
3. Explain why no ventilation is being supplied to Room 114 (Safe). Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2018.
09/25/2020 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, etc.). Provide the civil plans referenced on sheets P1.1 and P1.2 showing the installation of the water service to the building and the installation of the building sewer and backwater valve as part of the building plan set. Reference: Sections 104.2 and 107.2.1, IBC 2018.
2. Clarify detail 1/P3.1: is the capacity of the water heater 40-gallons or 119-gallons? Coordinate the CW and HW piping configuration and sizes with the plumbing plan on P1.2. Show the dimensions of the CW and HW inlets to the temperature mixing valve.
09/25/2020 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
10/07/2020 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
10/14/2020 JPEELDA1 FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/22/2020 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Sheet G0.1; Code Review (Maximum Building Height): The maximum building height indicates 40'-1 Story for non-sprinklered building. Please indicate 60' maximum height to the sprinklered building.
2. Sheet G0.1; Code Review: Please indicate on this sheet that the building has a NFPA Automatic Sprinkler System per the IBC Section 903.3.1.1.
3. Sheet G0.1; Code Review (Accessibility): Please revise the reference to the 2010 ADAAG to the 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1.
4. Sheet G0.1 (Code Review); Separation Distance: Per the IBC Table 602, exterior walls less than 5' from a property line require a 2 hour fire resistance rated wall. The entire south wall of the building appears to be less than 5' from the property line. Sheet A2.1 (General Notes) indicates all exterior walls are to be Type 1C Unless Otherwise Noted. Type 1C on Sheet G0.1 (Wall Types) does not indicate a fire resistance rated wall. Please revise that wall, indicating the fire resistance rating required (2 hour), and indicate the U.L. Listing Number for that wall assembly.
5. Sheet A0.01; Mounting Heights: The drinking fountain requires a high/low for standing/seated people. Please revise the detail per the ICC/ANSI Figure 602.5.
6. Sheet A5.2; Keynotes: Please add a reference in Note 05.12 to an access ladder detail, and provide that detail on the drawings.
7. Sheet A7.1; Elevation 4: Please indicate the vertical grab bar on this elevation.
8. Sheet A7.1; Elevation 5: Please indicate the vertical grab bar on this elevation.
9. Sheet A7.1; Elevation 9: Please indicate the distance from the finish floor to the top of the counter at this location (Break Room).
10. Sheet A7.1; Elevations 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, and 18: Please indicate the distance from the finish floor to the top of the counter.
11. Sheet A8.1; Door Schedule: The hardware on all Door Types indicates To Be Determined. Please provide this information on the drawings. The Door and Frame Schedule must be completed for all doors on this project.
12. Sheet S0.1; Standard Structural Notes (Foundation): A note references a Geotechnical Report. Please provide that report.
13. Sheet S2.1 (Detail 11); Structural Calculations (Page 56): The calculations indicate the footing thickness for the screen wall requires 13", while the detail indicates 1'-0". Please coordinate.
14. General: Please provide a Special Inspection Certificate with Parts A and B completed.
15. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments.
10/22/2020 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Needs Review
10/26/2020 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit updated drawings along with a detailed comment response letter, which states how all zoning review comments were addressed.

1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the unapproved development package (DP20-0183) and found that the building plans are consistent with the unapproved development package as it relates to the zoning requirements, which includes the building square footage, building height, building footprint, and location on the site.

2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal to assure that any updates made to the building plans or the development package does not affect zoning requirements.

3. COMMENT: Zoning cannot approve the building plans until all PDSD commercial plans reviewers have also approved the building plans.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Alexandra Hines at alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov.
10/27/2020 SBLOOD1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Approval of the DP is required before approval of the building permit.

Stephen Blood
stephen.blood@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/28/2020 IMONSHI1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed