Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T20CM05644
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/31/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/31/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/01/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Metering faucets are required for the lavatories located in public restrooms, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. (Lavatories located in individual units of R2 occupancies are exempt from this requirement but this building has no individual units equipped with lavatories.) Verify that the faucet cycle will last for at least 10-seconds. Reference: Section 419.6, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-09. 2. Verify that the distance from the hot water source to the hot water termination for the public lavatories complies with the requirements of Section C404.5, IECC 2018. 3. Provide pressure-absorbing devices for the water connections to appliances equipped with quick-acting or solenoid valves (e.g. clothes washers). Reference: Section 604.9, IPC 2018. 4. In two cases, roof drain and overflow drains are noted as being 4" (66 GPM and 82 GPM) but the roof leaders and overflow leaders are labeled as being 6" in size. Clarify this issue. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 5. Revise the location of the sediment trap shown in detail 1/P4.1 to be downstream of the appliance shut off valve, as close to the equipment as possible (see detail 2/P4.1). Reference: Section 408.4, IFGC 2018. |
| 09/03/2020 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. 1. Sheldon Mcinelly is not on the Oro Valley or Pima County list of qualified Special Inspectors for Electrical or Outdoor Lighting. 2. Ref; Plan Sheets, E3.1A, E3.1B, E3.1C. Please clarify Key Note #22 that refers to electrical equipment shown on the power plans.. If some of the Keyed notes do not apply as noted in parenthesis, please remove them from the electrical equipment or apparatus shown on the power floor plans. 3. Provide Panel and branch circuit or feeder designations for the Mechanical equipment shown on the Mechanical/Power plans. Ref; 2018 IBC sec, 107.2.1, 2017 NEC, 2018 IECC, City of Tucson Commercial Plan Submittal Requirements, 2012 Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. |
| 09/04/2020 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/08/2020 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: T20CM05644; Tucson Fire Station 9 Building Plans (1st Review) 730 S Wilmot – R-1 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 8, 2020 DUE DATE: August 28, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. The Development Package (DP) must be approved and issued prior to approval by Zoning. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the approved DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans and current or approved version of the DP as reference. |
| 09/08/2020 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet A0.01; Project Information (Design Occupant Load): Please indicate each Occupancy Classification SF, each Occupancy Classification occupant load factor, and the resulting occupant load calculations. 2. Sheet A0.01; Project Information (Design Occupant Load/Building Areas): The B Occupancy Classification indicated 436 SF and 25 occupants. Was the occupant load increased per the IBC Section 1004.5.1? Please indicate on this sheet. 3. Sheet A0.02; Exiting Floor Plan: The sum of the number of occupants using each exit exceeds the total number of building occupants indicated in the Project Information (91). Please revise to indicate the actual number of occupants at each exit. 4. Sheets A2.21, A2.22, A2.23, and A2.24; Wall Types: Please indicate the gauge of the studs at all metal stud walls in this schedule, or reference the location of that information. 5. Sheet A2.24; Floor Plan: In the Light Duty Bay (Room 124), there are two partition types (J) where no walls are indicated. Please verify. 6. Sheets S1.1, S1.2, S2.1, S2.2, S3.1, and S3.2; Plans: Please add north arrows to these plans. 7. Sheet S4.1; Details 12 and 15: Please add structural calculations for the lightpole drilled pier and for the flagpole foundation. 8. Sheet S4.2 (Detail 30); Structural Calculations (Page 2): The Structural Calculations indicate structural steel bolts are A307. while Detail 30 indicates A325N bolts. Please coordinate. 9. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 09/08/2020 | DTRAMME1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/21/2020 | JGARCIA1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | Exempt from impact fees per Tucson City Code Sec.23A-81.B.3 which states exception to impact fees when "A governmental entity controls and directs the development for a governmental purpose on property owned by a governmental entity." |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/21/2020 | MRESS1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |