Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T20CM04056
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/09/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not resolved. A feasibility report is not a substitute for construction plans. [Second comment: Comment not addressed.] [Initial comment: Provide plans sealed by an Arizona Registrant. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.] 2. Comment not resolved. A feasibility report is not a substitute for construction plans. [Second comment: Comment not addressed.] [Initial comment: Provide plans that show the extent of work to be performed and show that the work will conform to all relevant laws, ordinances, and codes. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.] 3. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide underground facility tracer wires per ARS 40-360.22.] 4. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide a full-open valve for the water service at the building entrance. Reference: Section 606.1(2), IPC 2018.] 5. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Show how the service hot water distribution system (note that the system is not a heating hot water system) complies with the requirements of Sections 607.2 and 607.2.1, IPC 2018 and Section R403.5.1, IECC 2018.] 6. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Show how the service hot water distribution piping will be insulated. Reference: Section R403.5.3, IECC 2018.] |