Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PREAPPLICATION
Plan Number - T19PRE0191
Review Name: PREAPPLICATION
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/09/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Completed | This site is within Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ) The following applies to landscape: The Planning and Development Services Department Director may grant a complete or partial exception to the landscape border standards for development within a HPZ. The exceptions may be granted if, after completion of the HPZ development review required by the HPZ, the PDSD Director determines that the standards are not compatible with the character and design elements of the HPZ. |
| 10/09/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | |
| 10/14/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Completed | Standard requirements will apply during development plan process. Zelin Canchola |
| 10/15/2019 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal PDSD Zoning Review FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Principal Planner PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting T19PRE0191 Address: 321 E 5th St Parcel(s): 117-04-0750 Zoning: HR-3 Existing Use: Multi-family residential Proposed Use: Multi-family residential TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 14, 2019 COMMENTS: 1. The proposal is to add on a new building onto an existing multi-family residential site. The new building would be used for a combination of storage and a new dwelling unit. 2. As presented, this would require: a. Development package. This includes site plan review. As no grading is proposed, this does not need to be prepared by a licensed architect or registered engineer. Review fees for the development package will likely total around $1,000. b. Individual parking plan. This site does not have enough parking per current code standards and the addition of another unit would require additional parking. One-bedroom units each require 1.5 parking spaces. Four one-bedroom units would require 6 parking spaces, 1 of which must be a handicap accessible space. An IPP is an administrative review process to reduce the number of required parking spaces. Justification for reduced parking can be made based on proximity to transit and assigned on-street permit parking. Please note, the IPP cannot reduce the one required handicap accessible parking space. Any parking on site must also meet maneuverability and surfacing requirements. The IPP application costs a total of $511.50. c. Historic review. As this site is within a historic preservation zone, historic review is required. This review could approve the reduced setbacks and allow for reductions in landscaping. A full HPZ review costs a total of $192.50. d. Design Development Option. The existing perimeter wall on the site does not meet current code standards. This wall would need to be reduced in height to meet the 6 ft height limit, or be approved through a DDO. A DDO is an administrative review process which allows for modifications to specific development standards. To be approvable, the wall height must be 8 ft or shorter. The cost for a DDO for wall height on a multi-family site is $319.00. e. The individual parking plan, historic review and DDO must be approved prior to approval of the development package. f. The proposed expansion of a new unit on this site would require full site compliance. This may require additional landscaping, pedestrian circulation (sidewalks) and transportation improvements. Please verify with other City reviewers. g. The addition of a full dwelling unit would require payment of development impact fees. A multi-family unit would total $4,075.00. 3. Alternate proposals for development would be to limit the new building in size or use. a. Option 1: A building constituting a more than 25% expansion with storage and sleeping quarters (not a full dwelling unit). Must be less than 50% size of main structure. This would still require a development package, individual parking plan, historic review and DDO. Full site compliance would still be required. Impact fees would not be required. b. Option 2: A building constituting a less than 25% expansion with storage and sleeping quarters (not a full dwelling unit). This would still require a development package and historic review. An individual parking plan and DDO would not be required. Full site compliance would not be required. Impact fees would not be required. 4. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the development review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions please contact me at elisa.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. |
| 10/16/2019 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Completed | 230 pm - T19PRE0191 - 321 E 5TH ST - SITE - tri-plex with new unit " Please determine the Fire Department's requirements for this new development, first. " Then, please meet with Ray Munoz at 837-2207 in the Tucson Water New Services Section to discuss: o The number of water service lines, water meters, and meter sizes, necessary to serve this development and meet the Fire Department's requirements. o The advantages and disadvantages of installing any necessary additional water service liens and meters via Tucson Water's Job Order Contract (JOC) process. " Then meet with Wastewater to determine their requirements. |
| 10/16/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | T19PRE0191 1. No special drainage requirements. |