Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PREAPPLICATION
Plan Number - T19PRE0190
Review Name: PREAPPLICATION
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Completed | This site is within the following overlay district: 5.12.11. DOWNTOWN LINKS SUBDISTRICT (DLS) A complete or partial exception to the landscaping and screening requirements in Section 7.6 may be granted by the PDSD Director, if shade along sidewalks, pedestrian circulation paths or outdoor patios is provided for pedestrians and customers in accordance Section 5.12.6.A.2. Alternative pedestrian access that creates connectivity between public entrances to the project and abutting sidewalk is allowed if no safety hazard is created. All pedestrian access must conform to the accessibility standards of the City's Building Code. |
| 10/09/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | |
| 10/22/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Completed | |
| 10/24/2019 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal PDSD Zoning Review FROM: Samuel Rogers; Planner PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting T19PRE0190 Address: 629 E 9th St. Parcel(s): 117-06-023A Zoning: C-3 Existing Use: Residential Proposed Use: Commercial (Light Retail/Food Service) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10/24/2019 COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06.0.0: Development Package (Tentative Plats and Site Plans). 2. Coordinate with Environmental Services to ensure trash pickup will be allowed at this location. 3. The project does not meet parking and street side setback requirements per UDC requirements. Relief for these requirement can be sought through a special application process such as the IID. 4. Per the Armory Park and Iron Horse, Mixed Use Sub-Area, a min. of 30% of Lot Area must be open space. Usable open space does not need to be located on the ground - green roof or terrace is acceptable, usable open space may be any combination of private and common space, and parking may not be counted as open space. 5. Per the Armory Park and Iron Horse, Mixed Use Sub-Area, Pedestrian access to open space is required. 6. If food service is not planned for this development: a. Per UDC Non-residential uses with a parking formula of one space per 300 square feet gross floor area or less intense formula that occupy a structure listed individually on the National Register of Historic Places or listed as a contributing property in a National Register Historic District, are exempt from Section 7.4.4.B, Minimum Number of Motor Vehicle Spaces Required, provided the historic designation of the contributing structure is maintained. This is a by-right parking reduction and does not need a special application. b. A Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) may be pursued for the location and type of the trash enclosure and pickup. c. A Design Development Option (DDO) may be pursued to reduce the required street side setbacks. 7. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions please contact me at samuel.rogers@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-6932. |
| 10/24/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | Pedestrian circulation must be provided from all buildings to each street. An accessible route must be provided to at least one street. There are no floodplains or special drainage considerations for this site. |
| 10/24/2019 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | With only preliminary plans available for review, my comments are as follows: •The house in question is a contributor to the Iron Horse Expansion National Register Historic District. •The wall that they are proposing to remove at the rear of the house is a very early enclosure. Removal of the rear wall will not impact the overall integrity of the house. •The door on the main house located on the west facade appears to be existing. If the door is replaced, a historically appropriate door should be installed in its place within the existing opening. •The new construction at the rear appears to be appropriate, but the plans will need more information. •The plans will need more information to understand all of the proposed work to the existing house and the materials/finishes for the new construction. •Once refined, the plans will need review by the Plans Review Subcommittee. If you have any questions, please let me know. Jodie Brown, AICP Historic Preservation Officer City of Tucson 201 North Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 www.tucsonaz.gov/historic-preservation Direct line: 520.837.6968 |
| 10/25/2019 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Completed | 130 pm - T19PRE0190 - 629 E 9TH ST - SITE IID 9th Street Retail Boutique " An existing 3/4 in water service line and 5/8 inch water meter currently serves this property. |