Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PREAPPLICATION
Plan Number - T19PRE0188
Review Name: PREAPPLICATION
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Completed | Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-10.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. Note: NPP plan or application for exception is applicable. |
| 10/09/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | |
| 10/14/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Completed | Standard requirements will apply during development plan process. Zelin Canchola |
| 10/15/2019 | MALLORY RESS | ZONING | REVIEW | Completed | CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal PDSD Zoning Review FROM: Mallory Ress, Planner PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting - T19PRE0188 Address: 1635 E. Limberlost Rd. Parcel(s): 108-21-028C&D Zoning: MH-1 Existing Use: Vacant Land Proposed Use: Single Family Residential (FLD Option) TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10/15/2019 COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package and Unified Development Code (UDC) Article 8.7.3 Flexible Lot Development. 2. The proposal is for an FLD subdivision of 7 single-family lots using Development Alternative B. In the MH-1 zone, Development Alternative B allows 70% site coverage, 6.25 units/acre and 25' building height. The proposal appears to meet these standards. 3. It appears as though this project is proposing to comply with 8.7.3.C.3.b.4 Additional Functional Open Space. Under the maximum density requirement 916 square feet of functional open space is required and the applicant is proposing 1050 square feet. 4. Setbacks on an FLD perimeter are required in accordance with the underlying zone. In the MH-1 zone, the perimeter boundary setback would be 6' or 2/3 the wall height. Interior setbacks can be reduced to what is required by the building code. 5. Access appears to be proposed through existing Jasmine Terrace subdivision by a 40' ingress egress easement. Applicant will need to show proof of access. Verify utilities can be serviced through this easement with individual utility providers. 6. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. 7. Any prior annexation or rezoning conditions will apply to the development of this property. If you have any questions please contact me at mallory.ress@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-6933. |
| 10/16/2019 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Completed | 200 pm - T19PRE0188 - 1635 E LIMBERLOST DR - SITE Jasmine Court, Concept Plan " No fire flow requirements have been included with this submittal. The fire flow requirements need to be determined, and a Water Master Plan will need to be submitted for this project to verify the existing water infrastructure can supply any applicable fire flow requirements. " The proposed on-site 6"water main will need to extend through the property and connect to the existing 6" water main to the north (Plan No 030-1984), as well as connecting to to the existing 6" water main in Cornee Ct. (Plan No. 082-1996) to form a loop. " A 15' minimum width water easement will need to be granted over the entire length of the on-site water main. " During the CDRC Meeting the question, "Would Tucson Water consider the use of a narrower easement?" was posed. The applicant may submit a written request the use of a narrower easement when the Water Master Plan is submitted for review and approval. But, such a request is unlikely to be approved, unless the applicant can demonstrate to Tucson Water's satisfaction within the request, that Tucson Water staff will be able to operate and maintain the water line with the same capabilities and ease, as if a wider easement had been granted. |
| 10/16/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | T19PRE0188 1. Demonstrate access rights to the property. 2. Retention/Detention must be in common area. 3. Site is neither balanced or critical. |