Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PREAPPLICATION
Plan Number - T19PRE0047
Review Name: PREAPPLICATION
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Completed | Note: 3750 S LUNDY AV is zoned R-2 Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-10.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. |
| 03/19/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | Please indicate existing fire hydrant locations on plan set. Please also provide deferred submittal to TFD for fire sprinklers on this project. |
| 03/20/2019 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC Thursday Pre-Submittal Transmittal PDSD Zoning Review FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Principal Planner PROJECT: Thursday Pre-submittal meeting (T19PRE0047) Address: 3750 & 37698 S Lundy Av Parcel(s): 119045900, 119045910 Zoning: C-2, R-2 Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Multi-Family Residential TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 20, 2019 COMMENTS: 1. Development must comply with the Administrative Manual Section 2-06 - Development Package. 2. Proposal 1 calls for a total of six multi-family residential units, two 1-bedroom units on the north (R-2) property and four 2-bedroom units on the south (C-2) property. a. In the R-2 zone, the setback from multi-family development (a nonresidential use) to nonresidential zones is 10' or 3/4 the height, whichever is greater. The distance between the proposed buildings is shown as 10', but the setback is measured from the zoning boundary. b. Additionally, in the C-2 zone, the setback from multi-family development (a nonresidential use) to a residential zone is 1 1/2 the height. The distance between the proposed buildings is shown at 10', but the setback is measured from the zoning boundary. c. Other setbacks appear to be adequate but cannot be fully determined without the proposed building heights. 3. Proposal 2 calls for a total of seven multi-family residential units, three 1-bedroom units on the north (R-2) property and four 2-bedroom units on the south (C-2) property. a. In the R-2 zone, the setback from multi-family development (a nonresidential use) to nonresidential zones is 10' or 3/4 the height, whichever is greater. The distance between the proposed buildings is shown as 15', but the setback is measured from the zoning boundary. b. In the R-2 zone, the setback from multi-family development (a nonresidential use) to residential zones is 10' or 3/4 the height, whichever is greater. The proposed setback of 8' to the west does not meet this standard. c. Additionally, in the C-2 zone, the setback from multi-family development (a nonresidential use) to a residential zone is 1 1/2 the height. The distance between the proposed buildings is shown at 10', but the setback is measured from the zoning boundary. d. Other setbacks appear to be adequate but cannot be fully determined without the proposed building heights. e. The proposed parking lot includes a one-way parking area access lane (PAAL) at a 16' width. If these spaces are designed at a 60 degree angle the width may be adequate. But, if this PAAL is required to serve as a fire lane, the minimum width for the PAAL is 20'. 4. Setbacks may be reduced through an administrative review process known as a Design Development Option (DDO). 5. The number of vehicle parking spaces in both proposals appears adequate. Long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces are required. 6. At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. 7. In the R-2 zone, multi-family development is subject to use-specific standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10. 8. The comments provided are preliminary and are not to be assumed as a complete review of the proposal. During the Development Package review process, a full review will be made by Zoning to assure compliance with the applicable UDC development criteria and Technical Standards. If you have any questions please contact me at elisa.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. |
| 03/20/2019 | SBEASLE1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Completed | Water service requirements for T19PRE0047 3750 South Lundy AV - Site - South Lundy Apartments may be able to be addressed by contacting Hugo Gonzalez at 837-2208 or Ray Munoz at 837-2207 in Tucson Water New Services. Thanks. Paul Baughman, PE, CFM, Civil Engineer Tucson Water 310 W Alameda St., Tucson, AZ 85701 520-837-2048 |
| 03/25/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Completed | T19PRE0047 1) Both proposed layouts do not provide sufficient service vehicle maneuvering area per TSM section 8 2) Project is located within a Balanced Basin. Stormwater detention/retention facilities shall be incorporated to ensure that the post development 2,10 and 110 year peak discharges do not exceed pre development conditions 3) A complete onsite pedestrian circulation path along with a connection to Lundy Av will be required. Existing sidewalk along Lundy will need to be confirmed to meet current ADA requirments John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 04/02/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Passed | |
| 04/02/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Completed | Pre-Submittal Complete Notice: T19PRE0047 Project Description: SITE - SOUTH LUNDY AVENUE APARTMENTS Prior to submitting, view the meeting review details on www.tucsonaz.gov/pro, search by activity number above. Alexandra Hines, AICP | City of Tucson Planning and Development Services - Lead Planner | 201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 | (520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov |