Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/WWM
Permit Number - T19CM09243
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/06/2020 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T19CM09243 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, please provide two sets of updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment revisions. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2018 International Residential Code and 2018 International Energy Conservation Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. Provide a complete roof framing plan with appropriate load carrying capacity, R301.1, Sheet S-06 requires updating with a truss system or correctly sized manufactured joist. The existing dwelling has an interior load bearing wall with foundation, thereby allowing 2x6 rafters. The addition requires a different design because of the interior wall placement is not close to the center of the building. SECTIONS - DETAILS: 1. An air-impermeable insulation material that will provide R-38 in a 2x6 rafter space will be closed-cell spray foam, R806.5. Some designs increase the rafter size for using less costly batt insulation along with a one inch layer of rigid foam board. ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. Show the service panel capacity such as 200 Amp which is the panel bus rating, E3403. The required demand should be calculated based on many factors including building size. If you have any questions please contact: Ken Van Karsen (520) 837-4912 City of Tucson Residential Plan Review |
| 07/31/2020 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: T19CM09243 222 W Kentucky Street Bedroom and Bath Addition Residential (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 31, 2020 The porch addition plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. This site is located in the R-3 zone (UDC 4.7.12). A single-family residence is a permitted use in this zone (Table 4.8-2). See Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6. 1. This comments has not been addressed. Provide documentation showing that the lot consolidation has been approved. Include both lots on the site plan. 2. As there are no permits for this shed a neighbor signoff is required as the shed does not meet perimeter yard setbacks. Per Unified Development Code (UDC) TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES the required perimeter yard setback is 6'-0" to the east property line. As this is an accessory structure per UDC Article 6.6.2.D An accessory structure that exceeds the allowable height of a wall within a perimeter yard and is detached from a principal structure shall comply with the perimeter yard width standards of the principal structure, except that the accessory structure may be built to a parcel line with the consent of the adjoining or, when separated by alley, adjacent property owner(s). That all said you can request a setback waiver from your neighbors located at 213 & 219 W Oklahoma St. The following statement must be provided on you plot plan, one for both neighbors "My Name is __________________and I am the owner of the property located at . I have reviewed the site plan and I have no objection to structure being located or constructed 1'-4" from the property line as depicted on the site plan.The shed at the rear of the property appears to be on the adjacent lot, not on the same one as the existing house. The shed appears to be larger than 200 square feet. Provide documentation showing approval of the shed. Provide the setbacks to the shed from the rear and side property line. 3. This comment was not addressed. The last approved plot plan shows the front of the house at 20'-0" and now the house has moved to 25'-0", clarify how this is possible. The actual front setback is 20'-0" from the property line (The previous comment was made in error). Refer to plan T13CM02849 for previous setback approval information for the property, follow this link https://www.tucsonaz.gov/sirepub/cache/2/cewcngloncr44zoes3lor15p/269003101302020023522456.PDF. 4. Comment not addressed. The correct distance from center of the street to the face of curb should be 18'-0" and the distance from face of curb to the street property line should be 7'-0" Draw, label and dimension the sidewalk and driveway location. 5. This comment was not fully addressed the perimeter yard setbacks listed in the title block are not correct. The required setbacks for side and rear yard is 6'-0" or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the structure's wall facing each interior property line. Correct the zoning information that is listed in the title block. The zoning is R3 and the listed side setbacks for the sides and rear are incorrect. Refer to UDC Table 6.3-2.A for the proper setback information. 6. Based on the elevations on sheet 8 it appears that the wall height for the addition along the west property line is 12' plus and addition 6" as the setback height is to design grade. That said the required perimeter yard setback to the west property line is 8'-4". A Design Development Option DDO must be applied for and approved prior to approval of these plans. DDO application can be found at: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/2019_DDO_for_Setback_and_Height_UDC.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Steve Shields by email at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or by phone at (520) 837-4956. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/04/2020 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |