Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T19CM08454
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/19/2019 | PIMA COUNTY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | BUILDING - COMMERCIAL 1. Please respond to all comments in writing. 2. No dimension between buildings is given on the site plan, sheet 3 of 10. However, by takeoff form digital plans, it is 17'-9". Per 2018 IBC 503.1.2 and fire separation distance definition in Section 202, an imaginary line can be drawn between the buildings giving a fire separation distance of 8'-9 ½" for each building. And per 705.2.3 combustible projections (porch roof structures) extending within 5-feet from the imaginary line shall be minimum 1-hour fire-resistance-rated unless the porch areas are protected by sprinklers. By takeoff the porch roof structures extend to within 4'-6" of the imaginary line. In the plans, either provide 1-hour fire-resistance-rating for the porch roof structures between buildings or extend the sprinkler system to these areas. Ref. 2018 IBC 705.2.3.1(exception 3). 3. On sheet A1.1 under Architectural Specifications at the end of Section 01100 a note states "SEE PROJECT MANUAL FOR FULL SPECIFICATIONS." Submit the Project Manual. 4. Revise the GLASS NOTE under the window schedules on sheet A5.0 to delete "and have "U" values that meet or exceed the requirements of the 2018 I.E.C.C. (0.40 for U values and 0.25 for SHGC)." The windows shall have U-0.38 and SHGC-0.23 per the LIHTC Energy Analysis Summary on sheet A1.1 or have your energy rater rerun his program using U 0.40 and SHGC 0.25 to see if the building still complies with the 2018 IECC with those changes. 5. On sheet A7.1 please continue the Type C drywall on the demising walls in each detail to the bottom of the roof sheathing per 2018 IBC 708.4(1) unless it is intended that the roof/ceiling assembly be fire-resistance rated, in which case indicate the UL Design number for the fire-rated roof/ceiling assembly. 6. Submit special inspections certificate(s) required by the City of Tucson. |
| 11/19/2019 | PIMA COUNTY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLUMBING - COMMERCIAL 1. The Water Calculations on sheet P2.1 state that there will be a new 1 ½" water meter; however the civil Utilities + Easements Plan, sheet 5 of 10, shows both buildings tied together with a single 2" water meter. Please coordinate with Civil Engineer so that documents show the same thing. |
| 11/19/2019 | PIMA COUNTY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ELECTRICAL - COMMERCIAL 1. The engineer's seal is unreadable. 2. Pole-Mounted Fixture Detail B on sheet E1.3 requires the pole manufacturer to provide a pole base design. Please delete this requirement and refer to the structural engineer of record's detail 109/S4.1. Ref. 2018 IBC 107.3.2.1. 3. Electrical plan General Note C shall include kitchens and laundry areas for AFCI-protection. Ref. NEC 210.12(A). 4. Electrical plan General Note G shall be revised so that percentage of high-efficacy lamps is 90% rather than 70%. Ref. 2018 IECC R404.1. |
| 11/19/2019 | PAUL CAMARENA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Paul Camarena PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: NEW MULTI-FAMILY APARTMENT BUILDING Building plans (1st Review) 2940 N ORACLE RD T19CM07524 - C-2 Zoning - Related to DP19-0250 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 08, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 01. COMMENT: COMMENT: Zoning has done a review of the building plans. In addition, while the building are consistent as it relates to the zoning review purview zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Commercial Plans reviewer(s) have approved the building plans. 02. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal to assure consistency with the DP. Once the DP is approved by all reviewers and the building plans are approved by the Commercial Plans reviewers zoning can approve the building plans If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Paul Camarena any time during the week at (520) 837-4082 or by email Paul.Camarena@Tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Building Plans |
| 11/19/2019 | PIMA COUNTY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/27/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) DP19-0250 needs to be approved prior to approval of the building plans 2) Ensure all commercial reviews are complete 3) Make sure all roof drains scupper under sidewalks/pedestrian areas as applicable |
| 11/27/2019 | MROSS2 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/27/2019 | RMCCOY1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 12/02/2019 | PIMA COUNTY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2019 | SBORZAK1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |