Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T19CM05078
Parcel: 13608032A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T19CM05078
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/26/2020 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Section Manager

PROJECT: Northwest Medical Center - Houghton
T19CM05078
Building Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 26, 2020

1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the approved development package DP19-0164. While the building plans are consistent with the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview of the building footprint, building height, square footage, site conditions etc., zoning cannot approve the building plans until the following comment(s) are addressed and all PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans.

2. The development package sheets provided in the building plan do not match the approved development package. The total number of sheets is different and there are several sheets in the building set that do not match the same sheet in the approved development package. There are sheets in the building set that have revision clouds that are not shown on the development package sheets. The development package sheets provided in the building set should either be (1) the stamped approved development package sheets, (2) marked for reference only, or (3) removed from the building plans. If you elect to use option (2) or (3) ensure that the approved utility plans from the development package are provided in the building set.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
06/29/2020 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
06/29/2020 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revised comments 6-30-20
(a) Response #2. (#4b). The GEC size is clear. The question is what is utilized as the GROUNDING ELECTRODE? Please read the comment carefully.
(b) Response#2. (#4g). The Key Note #3 still remains for the branch circuit designation for the lighting on plan sheet E06.00 Detail 7.
Ref:2018 IBC 107.2.1. 2017 NEC
07/01/2020 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Comment not resolved. A keynote on a mechanical drawing is not the same as the architect identifying proposed deferred submittals for the activity that are then approved or denied by the building official. Reference: Section 107.3.4.1, IBC 2018. [Second comment: Deferred submittals must be identified on the construction documents by the architect and approved by the building official as part of the approval process.] [Initial comment: Provide structural calculations and details to show how the Computer Room AC units are to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2018.]
2. Hood installation is more than just a structural issue. Hood installation is not allowed to be a deferred submittal. [Second comment: Hood installation is not allowed to be a deferred submittal.] [Initial comment: Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.2.4, IMC 2018 (the hood hanging weight plus the weight of personnel working in or on the hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2018.]
07/01/2020 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change An L-1 lavatory with a non-metering faucet is still shown in public restrooms (e.g. rooms 1140, 1141, 1185B, 1483, 1514B, 1591, 2214, and 2421) [Second comment: Lavatory model L-1 installed in public restrooms requires a metering faucet. Provide a statement requiring that the time out for the automatic faucets be set to 30-seconds.] [Initial comment: Provide automatic faucets for lavatories located in public restrooms (including staff restrooms). Verify that the automatic faucets will operate for a minimum time of 10-seconds but have an automatic time out to limit the amount of water dispensed to 0.25 gallons per cycle. Reference: Section 419.6, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-09.]
07/02/2020 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed Sheet C 06.02 updated 07/02/20 to show two water meters to ensure two uninterruptable water sources. [Second comment: The intent of having two sources of domestic water for the hospital is "...to minimize the potential for an interruption of the supply of water in the event of a water main or water service pipe failure." You have a single source of failure at the 6" water valve that serves the hospital.] [Initial comment: The site utility drawing, C 06.03, shows a single water supply to the proposed hospital. Provide two water service pipes to the hospital per Section 609.2, IPC 2018.]