Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T19CM04344
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2019 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | Submit the completed Special Inspection Form for special inspections per structural plans . IBC 107.2.1. |
| 06/26/2019 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/15/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T19CM04344 - Parking Lot anon and Solar Canopies Building Plan Review (1st Review) El Rio Apartments Complex 1637 W. El Rio Drive - R-2 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 15, 2019 DUE DATE: July 17, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has done a cursory review of the building plans for the proposed Non and Solar Carport canopies. Prior to zoning approval of the building plans, a Development Package will have to be submitted for review and approval by the PDSD site review team. Address the following zoning comments on the DP and building plans before resubmitting for review. If additional applications such as a design development option or board of adjustment variance are required, that additional application must be approved prior to re-submittal of the building plans or DP. 2. COMMENT: Per the overall site plan sheet, it appears that there are multiple detached parking canopies proposed in the parking areas. All detached accessory structures in a residential zone must be placed on site to meet the minimum street side building setbacks within an established area. Detached accessory structures may not be placed on a front or street side perimeter yard without meeting the following: a. Along a side street yard perimeter detached accessory structures must be setback 10 feet from the property line. b. Along the front street perimeter yard the detached accessory structures must be setback the greater of 20 feet or 1.5 x the Hgt of the structure. In addition, along the front street perimeter yard the accessory structure cannot be placed anywhere within the front street perimeter yard without an approved variance through the board of adjustment process. c. The three carport structures along the El Rio street frontage side can be relocated south about two spaces and should be aligned with the buildings meeting the required setback. The two carports along the Mohave Avenue street frontage must be setback to meet ten foot setback requirement. (If you have any questions related these setback requirements feel free to call or email me.) d. If the applicant wishes to process a DDO or B of A variance please contact Mark Castro for process information, fees and timing. 3. COMMENT: Carport structures, whether PV or non-PV structures must be designed to provide a two foot setback from back end of the parking spaces. Include a dimensioned detail drawing demonstrating compliance. 4. COMMENT: Include a line site plan with dimensions of the PAAL widths, setbacks from the carport structures to the back end of the parking spaces, building setbacks from the property line to the end of the canopy roofs for the five canopies fronting along both streets. 5. COMMENT: The comments above are normally made on site reviews. However since a DP Site plan has not been submitted zoning has made the comments at this time to make the applicant aware of the non-compliant carports. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the DP once it is reviewed by the site review team. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans |
| 07/22/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. This site is partially within FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area. Floodplain Use Permits will be required. 2. Provide a complete development package showing the SFHA and location of all proposed structures. 3. Clearly show how the proposed canopies will not adversely impact access to solid waste enclosures and other facilities at the site. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/17/2019 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |