Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T19CM04191
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/30/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The two Chicago metering faucets that I could find with model numbers close to the one you submitted, 797-335ABCP and 797-665ABCP, have an adjustable run time of 2 to 15-seconds and a maximum delivery of 0.20 gallons per cycle (not GPM). For accessibility, specify a run time greater than 10-seconds (Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-09). [Initial comment: Verify that the specified metering faucet for the public lavatories can be set to dispense a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 419.6, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-09.] 2. Clarify the design of the recirculating hot water system. The symbol for the hot water return (HWR) is three dashes and should connect to the cold water inlet to the water heater. Verify the heat loss of the recirculating system; a small system such as yours typically needs to recirculate only 1 GPM through a ½" HWR. [Initial comment: The developed length of the hot water supply piping appears to be greater than fifty feet; provide a method for maintaining the temperature of the hot water supply system. Reference: Section 607.2, IPC 2018.] 3. See Table C404.5.1, IECC 2018; the maximum distance from a heat source (i.e. the recirculating loop) and a lavatory in a public restroom is 2-feet with ½" pipe (6-inches with ¾" pipe). [Initial comment: Verify that the distance to the hot water terminations from the hot water source complies with the requirements of Section C404.5, IECC 2018.] |
| 08/30/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Recheck your fixture unit calculations - you show two different demands for the gym and the total demand for the apartment complex appears to be under-estimated. Verify the fixture units used for the plumbing fixtures. The sauna and steam room are not plumbing fixtures; add their individual demands to the total demand for the plumbing fixtures. [Initial comment: Verify the size of the water meter serving this suite, the size of the backflow preventer associated with the water meter, and provide the total water demand served by the water meter. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.] 2. The water pressure used in the calculations is supposed to be the minimum pressure available at the water source (i.e. the water meter). Your calculations used 65 PSI but Tucson Water maintains that the minimum pressure should be 54 PSI. In addition, base the static lift on the highest water outlet (e.g. a showerhead on the second floor of the apartment). See Appendix E, IPC 2018 for detailed instructions. [Initial comment: Verify the water pressure range for the site; it is not 65 PSI. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.] |
| 09/03/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide specifications on the drawings for the vertical fenestration that matches the SHGC and U-values used in the COMcheck envelope analysis. [Initial comment: Provide calculations for the building envelope to demonstrate compliance with the energy code (e.g. COMcheck). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. As a minimum, the information shall include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2018.] 2. The specified programmable thermostat does not comply with the control requirements of Section C403.4, IECC 2018. [Initial comment: Show that the proposed HVAC equipment complies with the requirements of Section C403, IECC 2018 for efficiency and controls (e.g. COMcheck).] 3. Show how ventilation is provided to the office. [Initial comment: Provide specifications for the proposed mini-split AC unit for the office. Show how it will provide ventilation for the office. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.] 4. Note not found. [Initial comment: Secure the refrigerant circuit access ports of the condensing units to prevent unauthorized access. Reference: Section 1101.10, IMC 2018.] |
| 09/04/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T19CM04191 - New Gym Building - Multi-family Development Building Plan Review (2nd Review) - Related to DP18-0262 140 S. Tucson Boulevard - C-1/C-2 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 4, 2019 DUE DATE: September 19, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the Building plans for compliance with the approved version of the development package. While the building footprint and the site revisions are consistent with the approved version of the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc.) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal to assure that any revisions made to the building plans do not affect zoning requirements and that all PDSD commercial plans reviewers have also approved the building plans and that the DP18-0262 has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: as noted above |
| 09/05/2019 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/06/2019 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Cover Sheet - Code Review - 6. Occupant Loads Restroom Area 559/100 = 3 .[check your math]. For Locker Room [not called restroom area] the occupant load factor is 50 [ Same as the Gym] 559/50 = 11 , clarify square footage and occupancy in the Code Review . IBC Table 1004.5. 2. Revise the code analysis for the minimum number of required plumbing fixtures using the corrected occupant load . 2018 IBC Chapter 29 and Table 2902.1 . IBC 107.2.1 Please respond to plan review comments in writting |
| 09/18/2019 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. 1. Ref; Plan Sheet E-1. Show the circuit and panel designation for 'CU #2' on the plan. 2. Plan Sheet E-2 missing registrant seal and sheet information. 3. Provide a note on plan sheet E-1 and E-2 to provide for Tamper Resistant Receptacles. The response to the previous electrical review comment #3 was, "NEC 406.12 is for dwellings". Please see that the 2017 NEC art 406.12 (6) includes gymnasiums. 4. Provide manufacturer cut sheets or verify that the light source color temperature for the exterior lighting does not exceed 3500Kelvin. Section 402.1 OLC. Ref; 2018 IBC sec 107.2.1, 2017 NEC. 2012 Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code (OLC). |
| 09/24/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/24/2019 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved |