Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T19CM03510
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/30/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide calculations for the building envelope to demonstrate compliance with the energy code (e.g. COMcheck). Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2018. 2. Provide structural calculations to verify that the roof framing is adequate to support the proposed mechanical units on the roof (e.g. point load as well as dead load). Provide structural details as required for any special framing revisions needed to support the units and frame the roof penetrations. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2018. 3. Coordinate the location of the mechanical units as shown on section B/A401 with their location on the roof plan, A300. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018. 4. The City of Tucson did not adopt ASHRAE Standard 62.1 for ventilation calculations and the 2018 IMC only references the ASHRAE Standard for the purpose of calculating the system ventilation efficiency (Ev). Provide calculations to show that the outdoor airflow rate of the ventilation system is in accordance with Section 403.3.1.1, IMC 2018. 5. Spaces in which factory-built recirculating appliances (e.g. Turbochef E5-1530) tested in accordance with UL 710B are installed are considered to be kitchens and shall be ventilated per Section 403.3.1.1, IMC 2018. The minimum exhaust rate shall be 0.70 CFM per square foot, using a minimum area of 100 square feet for each individual appliance. Reference: Section 507.1, exception 2, IMC 2018. 6. Appliances that produce heat and moisture but do not require the installation of a Type II hood shall be provided with general exhaust at a rate of 0.70 CFM per square foot, using a minimum area of 100 square feet for each individual appliance. Reference: Section 507.3, exception 2, IMC 2018. |
| 05/30/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 3/4" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 16.6 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2018. 2. Water supply connections to coffee machines and non-carbonated beverage dispensers shall be protected with backflow preventers conforming to ASSE 1022 or ASSE 1024. Reference: Section 608.17.1.2, IPC 2018. 3. Verify that all of the vents (except for vents serving interceptors located outdoors) rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally (e.g. the floor sinks located at the east end of the building). Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2018. 4. Verify that the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department will not require a grease interceptor for this activity. (Contact: Steve Valencia, 520-724-6209, steven.valencia@pima.gov) Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2018, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 05/30/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/03/2019 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 06/03/2019 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T19CM03510 1. Sheet CVR; Project Description: Please include in the description the covered walkway and the drive through canopy. 2. Sheet CVR; Required Plumbing Fixtures: Please indicate on this sheet that per the IBC Section 2902.2 (Exception 2), separate facilities for each sex shall not be required in structures with a total occupant load of 15 or fewer, therefore one unisex restroom is allowed. 3. Sheet CVR; Deferred Submittals: A note indicates a fire sprinkler system is not required, but the Project Data (Construction Type) indicates this building is sprinklered. Please clarify. 4. Sheet GS1; Deferred Submittals: Please add to this section that all deferred submittals shall meet the requirements of the IBC Section 107.3.4.1. 5. Sheet GS1; Foundations: This sheet indicates a soil report is "Not Applicable". Please revise to indicate the Geotechnical Report by PSI, Inc., including soil preparation at footing locations, requires minimum footing depths and sizes, and allowable soil bearing pressure. 6. Sheet AS101; Project Description: Please include in the description the covered walkway and the drive through canopy. 7. Sheet AS102; Detail 15: Please provide structural calculations for new light pole bases on this site. 8. Sheet A100; Foundation Plan: At two locations on the south building wall, an enlarged Detail 8C/AS102 is indicated. That detail is specific to bollards located at the trash enclosure. Please verify and add a new detail for a bollard adjacent to the building wall. 9. Sheet A102; Plan 4A; Section 4B: Plan 4A indicates 4-3/4" diameter anchors, while Section 4B indicates 4-5/8" diameter x 6" anchor bolts (Calculations also indicate 4-3/4" diameter anchors). Please coordinate. 10. Sheet A102 (Sections 8 and 10); Sheet A100 (Foundation Plan): The Sections indicate to see foundation plans for the footing size. A note at the west building wall indicates "Exterior footing 1'-4" W. x 8" D. continuous footing". If this is for all exterior building walls, please add "Typical" to the footing note. 11. Sheet A201; Occupant/Exit Plan: The Legend indicates a symbol for an Outdoor Dining Area, but that symbol does not appear on the plan. Please verify. 12. Sheet A201; Occupant/Exit Plan: Please indicate on this plan that the Exit Access Travel Distances meet the requirements of the IBC Table 1017.2. 13. Sheet A300; Roof Framing Plan: Section 7/A302 is cut at the building interior shear walls. This Section was not located on Sheet A302. Please verify. 14. Sheet A303; Roof Plan: Section 5/A300 is cut at the southeast corner of the building. This Section was not located on Sheet A303. Please verify. 15. Structural Calculations; Sheet 495 (Footing 1): Is this footing indicated on the Foundation Plan (A100)? Please verify the location on the drawings. 16. Structural Calculations; Page 495: This Page indicates Footing 1 design (2'-0" SQ x 12" T). Where is this footing indicated on the drawings? Please verify. 17. Structural Calculations (Page 497); Sheet A100 (Foundation Plan): The calculation for Footing 1A indicates this footing is 3.0' x 3.0' x 18" Thick, while the Foundation Plan indicates 36" SQ x 12" Thick (on west building wall). Is this the same calculation on Sheet 509? Please verify and revise the footing size as required. 18. Structural Calculations (Page 499); Sheet A100 (Foundation Plan): The calculation for Footing 2 indicates this footing is 3.5' x 3.5' x 18" Thick. There is one footing on Sheet A100 (South Building Wall) that indicates a 42" SQ x 12" Thick footing, but does not reference the footing #2 on the Plan. Is this the same as F2 in the calculations? Please verify and coordinate the footing thickness as required. 19. Structural Calculations (Page 503); Sheet A100 (Foundation Plan): The calculation for Footing 4 indicates this footing is 4.5' x 4.5' x 24" Thick. There is one footing on Sheet A100 (South Side of Canopy) that indicates a 54" SQ x 18" Thick footing, but does not reference the footing #4 on the Plan. Is this the same as F4 in the calculations? Please verify and coordinate the footing thickness as required. 20. Structural Calculations (Page 505); Sheet A100 (Foundation Plan): The calculation for Footing 5 indicates this footing is 5.0' x 5.0' x 24" Thick. There are two footings on Sheet A100 (East Side of Canopy) that indicates a 60" SQ x 24" Thick footing, but does not reference the footing as #5 on the Plan. Is this the same as F5 in the calculations? Please verify and coordinate the footing. 21. Structural Calculations (Page 507); Sheet A100 (Foundation Plan): The calculation for Footing 6 indicates this footing is 3.0' x 4.5' x 18" Thick. There are two footings on Sheet A100 (East Wall of Building) that indicate a 36"W. x 60"L. x 18" Thick footing, but do not reference the footing as F6 on the Plan. Please verify. 22. General: Please provide a Special Inspection Certificate with Parts A and B completed. This form can be located on our website at www.tucsonaz.gov/PDSD. 23. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. Reviewed by Eric Newcomb Contact at 520-837-4911 or Eric.Newcomb@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/04/2019 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Fire alarms and fire sprinklers are not required for this building. Please revise notes on cover sheet to indicate they are not required and will not be installed. |
| 06/18/2019 | RMCCOY1 | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide outdoor lighting in compliance with the 2012 City of Tucson / Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. IBC 107.2.1. 2. Sheet E3.1 - Electrical Specifications ( Residential ) - project is not residential , amend plans . IBC 107.2.1. Respond to plan review comments in writting . Cloud revisions on plans . |
| 06/21/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP19-0110 must be approved first. Ensure roof drains are not directed to sidewalks. |
| 07/01/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T19CM03510 - The Human Bean - Coffee Shop Building Plan Review (1st Review) - Related to DP19-0110 6295 E 22nd Street - C-2 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 1, 2019 DUE DATE: June 27, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the Building plans for compliance with the unapproved version of the development package. While the building footprint and the site revisions are consistent with the unapproved version of the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc.) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal to assure that any revisions made to the building plans do not affect zoning requirements and that all PDSD commercial plans reviewers have also approved the building plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: as noted above |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/09/2019 | AMARTIN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |