Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T19CM03164
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2020 | IMONSHI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Iman Monshizadeh PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Moose Lodge - T19CM03164 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 2nd, 2019 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans have been reviewed for compliance with development package DP19-0100 and although it appears that the building plans meet the requirements of DP19-0100 Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the development package has been approved. 3. Until all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Iman.monshizadeh@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4082 |
| 01/06/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions to the building envelope (e.g. COMcheck); use the climate zone for Tucson. Reference: Sections C402, C502.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2018.] 2. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Show that the proposed walk-in cooler complies with the requirements of Section C403.10.2, IECC 2018.] 3. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide make-up air for the clothes dryer. Reference: Section 504.6, IMC 2018.] |
| 01/06/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 01/06/2020 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revised gas piping plan (P1 and P2) and schematic (P6) have gas pipes that are incorrectly sized (e.g. branch to range, branch to WH-1 and main gas line on P1). [Initial comment: Correct the size of the gas pipe serving AC-1 and AC-6 (144 CFH at 150-feet).] 2. General Note B on sheet P2 calls for waste piping 3" and larger to have a 1/8" per foot slope. Interior grease waste pipes upstream of the grease interceptor require a minimum slope of ¼" per foot. Reference: Section 704.1, IPC 2018. |
| 01/08/2020 | MROSS2 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/09/2020 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1 No changes to electrical….. Could not locate a written response to the previous review comment. Ref; 2018 IBC 107.2.1, 2017 NEC, City of Tucson Commercial Plan Submittal requirements, 2012 Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. |
| 01/17/2020 | PMARTIN1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 12/23/2019 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |