Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T19CM01180
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/13/2019 | PMARTIN1 | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Reviewer: Chris Anderson, September 9, 2019 ELECTRICAL - COMMERCIAL 1. Please respond to these review comments in writing. 2. These are contract documents and record documents. Changes to the design must be documented on each sheet where pertinent information exists. That is not the case for this submittal. Please go through each electrical sheet and ensure that all modifications and deletions are clearly noted. 3. Thomas Moll, the electrical engineer, was not made aware of this major change to his design and his drawings. While the Arizona Board of Technical Registration's Substantive Policy 1 allows another registrant to modify the documents of another registrant, the architect must clearly delineate all modifications and seal those changes, taking full responsibility for the changes and the impact of those changes to the original design. At a minimum, the architect shall identify and seal all changes (see electrical item 2 above) and provide a letter from the electrical engineer with his company's letterhead, sealed by the engineer, and acknowledging the architect's changes to his design. |
| 09/13/2019 | PIMA COUNTY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Reviewer: Chris Anderson, September 9, 2019 MECHANICAL - COMMERCIAL 1. Please respond to these review comments in writing. 2. These are contract documents and record documents. Changes to the design must be documented on each mechanical sheet where pertinent information exists. That is not the case for this submittal. Please go through each sheet and ensure that all modifications and deletions are clearly noted. 3. Dan Chilton, the mechanical engineer, was not made aware of this major change to his design and his drawings. While the Arizona Board of Technical Registration's Substantive Policy 1 allows another registrant to modify the documents of another registrant, the architect must clearly delineate all modifications and seal those changes, taking full responsibility for the changes and the impact of those changes to the original design. At a minimum, the architect shall identify and seal all changes (see mechanical item 2 above) and provide a letter from the mechanical engineer with his company's letterhead, sealed by the engineer, and acknowledging the architect's changes to his design. |
| 09/13/2019 | PIMA COUNTY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Reviewer: Chris Anderson, September 9, 2019 BUILDING - COMMERCIAL 1. Please respond to these review comments in writing. 2. These are contract documents and record documents. Changes to the design must be documented on each sheet where pertinent information exists. That is not the case for this submittal. Please go through each architectural and structural sheet and ensure that all modifications and deletions are clearly noted. 3. Two stairs to the second floor are still shown on the plans on sheet A1. Indicate that they will be deleted and show what will be done with the spaces occupied by the stairs. 4. Delete "STAIR #2" from the dimension floor plan, sheet A2. 5. On sheet A2 cloud the added notes to identify them as part of this revision and enlarge the text to no less than 3/32" per COT standard. 6. There are many walls at the 1st floor that now are not braced at the top because the 2nd floor is removed. Please explain how you intend to laterally brace 1st floor walls. 7. Various 2x4 walls are shown full height from floor to roof structure. Please verify the stud size and spacing required (and available) for laterally unsupported 25-foot high wood framed walls. 8. A new note on sheet A2 states that all ceilings will be suspended from the roof structure and this is probably fine for acoustical tile ceiling systems, how will the gypsum board for ceilings be supported in compliance with Code? 9. Paul Seppala, the structural engineer, was not made aware of this major change to his design and his drawings. While the Arizona Board of Technical Registration's Substantive Policy 1 allows another registrant to modify the documents of another registrant, the architect must clearly delineate all modifications and seal those changes, taking full responsibility for the changes and the impact of those changes to the original design. At a minimum, the architect shall identify and seal all changes (see building item 2 above) and provide a letter from the structural engineer with his company's letterhead, sealed by the engineer, and acknowledging the architect's changes to his design. |
| 09/13/2019 | PIMA COUNTY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Reviewer: Chris Anderson, September 9, 2019 PLUMBING - COMMERCIAL 1. Please respond to these review comments in writing. 2. These are contract documents and record documents. Changes to the design must be documented on each sheet where pertinent information exists. That is not the case for this submittal. Please go through each plumbing sheet and ensure that all modifications and deletions are clearly noted. 3. Dan Chilton, the plumbing engineer, was not made aware of this major change to his design and his drawings. While the Arizona Board of Technical Registration's Substantive Policy 1 allows another registrant to modify the documents of another registrant, the architect must clearly delineate all modifications and seal those changes, taking full responsibility for the changes and the impact of those changes to the original design. At a minimum, the architect shall identify and seal all changes (see plumbingl item 2 above) and provide a letter from the plumbing engineer with his company's letterhead, sealed by the engineer, and acknowledging the architect's changes to his design. |