Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: T18PI00043
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: PIA - SUBMITTAL

Plan Number - T18PI00043
Review Name: PIA - SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/06/2019 GARY WITTWER DOT LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Please check the existing ROW along Silverlake. It appears to me that you are encroaching into the existing ROW. Please identify the ROW on all sides of the project.
2. The existing landscape and irrigation along Silverlake belong to TDOT. You may not encroach into this area. All required landscaping from DSD will need to be on site.
3. You will need to add TDOT standard notes to these landscape and irrigation plans.
4. If any construction is to happen on the unnamed road, the City will require appropriate sleeving for our existing irrigation system.
02/06/2019 FSHENK1 UTILITY CLEARANCES COT STREETS DIVISION Needs Review
02/06/2019 ZELIN CANCHOLA DOT TRAFFIC REVIEW Approved
02/06/2019 FSHENK1 UTILITY CLEARANCES COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT Needs Review
02/06/2019 FSHENK1 UTILITY CLEARANCES PC WASTEWATER MGMT Completed
02/06/2019 FSHENK1 UTILITY CLEARANCES QUEST COMMUNICATION Needs Review
02/06/2019 FSHENK1 UTILITY CLEARANCES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO Needs Review
02/06/2019 FSHENK1 UTILITY CLEARANCES COX COMMUNICATION Needs Review
02/06/2019 FSHENK1 UTILITY CLEARANCES SOUTHWEST GAS CORP Needs Review
02/06/2019 FSHENK1 UTILITY CLEARANCES EL PASO NATURAL GAS Completed
02/06/2019 FSHENK1 UTILITY CLEARANCES KINDER MORGAN ENERGY Completed
02/11/2019 FSHENK1 DOT MAPS & RECORDS REVIEW Denied The TDOT Maps & Records Section has reviewed the PIA Plan and does not recommend approval. The following comments need to be addressed prior to submitting for the next review on the red-lines.

1. Cover Sheet missing "Constructed by:" Red-Lines by:" "Record Document Document by:" Signature Lines.
2. ORIGINAL SIZE 24" X 36" DO NOT SCALE A REDUCED SIZE note missing.
3. Margin is only 1.5" and not 2" on all pages.
4. Record Document block only to appear on final as-built plans. Please, just reserve the space for submittal.
5. Project Title goes here. Please reference red-lines to associate comment to location.
6. Plan Number is U-2018-018
7. Sheet 2 of 31 - Record Document block only to appear on final as-built plans. Please, just reserve the space for submittal.
8. Sheet 2, Project Title goes here. Please carry plan number and associated template guidelines throughout plan set. May need to submit Offsite-Improvement Plans per PIA guidelines, to match submittal requirements.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6638 or Scott.Weber@tucsonaz.gov.
02/11/2019 FSHENK1 DOT ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATOR REVIEW Denied Please address the following City of Tucson Department of Transportation Engineering Review Comments per Tucson Code Chapter 25, Tucson Code Chapter 29 Article VIII & Technical Standards 2,4,7, & 10. When responding, please provide a comprehensive letter of response to each comment to ensure proper revisions are endorsed. The following comments need to be addressed in the subsequent plan submittal. Please return redlined drawings with next submittal and reference PIA activity number on all correspondences.
Comments:
The Flood-Plain & Storm-Water Division has completed the review of the PIA plan and does not recommend approval at this time.
1. In Plan Number X-2018-XXX, on Sheet X, Basin #3 - Please provide invert elevation for existing storm drain.
2. Provide copy of W.A.S.H. - E.R.R. Report
3. Provide documentation previously obtained from Transportation Flood-Plain Administrator approving storm drain outlet and the use of H.D.P.E. within the Public Right-of-Way.
4. Please provide Mayor& Council approval for proposed concrete headwall in Grey-Hound W.A.S.H. ordinance watercourse.
5. There is a local scour concern for the proposed outlet structure in the Public Right-of-Way. Please explain how no adverse impact is achieved for this proposal and the reduced probability of adverse impact to adjacent properties.
6. Assure Erosion Hazard Setback & Flood-Plain Limits are delineated on all sheets. Please also provide Large Scale Detail of Public Right-of-Way Improvements to show better detailed drainage improvements.
7. Provide copy of revised drainage report to include drainage facility maintenance recommendations for annual maintenance inspection by City of Tucson Civil Engineer, or designated representative.
8. Label all drainage easements as private or public.
9. Please explain why threshold retention requirements were not applied in drainage report.
10. Please explain whether a waiver for retention was requested per soils report, page 9, earthwork section within the 4th paragraph.
11. Revise note on S.W.P.P. sheet cover page to clarify correct flood zone. This project has both local jurisdictional flood-plain, as well as, F.E.M.A. 500-Year SFHA impacting parcel.
12. Please review complete S.W.P.P. and Best Management Practices sheets to ensure next review can be completed and changes from the cover page are reflected throughout rest of plan sheets.

If you have any questions please contact Elizabeth Leibold @ Elizabeth.leibold@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4934.
02/13/2019 CSALTZM1 DOT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied 1) Use PIA format for project Plans
2) Note callouts for sheet number for DETAILS needs to be corrected to match correct sheet detail sare located on.
3) Detail Access ramps to show compliance with ADA slope requirements.
4) Detail 2 sheet 8 revise detail to show PAG Standard curb 209 type 2 and Standard 100 sidewalk (6 Ft. wide).
5) Structural pavement section for Silverlake Road - see City of Tucson plan I-88-048, Silverlake Road, Mission Road to I-10. Ref. Referance web site: http://maps2tucson.gov/Html5Viewer/?viewer=maptucsom
6) Construction note 9 sheets 12 and 13 change to read PAG Standard 209 Type 2.
7) Southeast corner of Silverlake Road approx. station 26+75 need terminal curb section Standard 212. Remove curb and gutter and use PAG Standard 209 type 2 curb.
8) Sidewalk along Silverlake Road use PAG Standard 200 (6 Ft. wide with 3 Ft. between back of curb and sidewalk).
02/14/2019 FSHENK1 PIA COORDINATOR CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSSADOR Completed
02/14/2019 FSHENK1 DOT PERMITS & CODES REVIEW Approved Please see Engineering and Administration comments. Permits & Codes does not have any comments.
02/14/2019 FSHENK1 PIA COORDINATOR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed